\begin{table}%T3
    \caption{Fluxes and positions for the 2 continuum peaks
      inferred from global fits to the {\it uv} plane data.} 
%\centerline
{\small
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
     \hline \hline Source & Frequency & Wavelength & Fitted shape & Flux$^a$
      & Offset from phase center \\ & (GHz) & (mm) & & (mJy) & ($''$)
      \\ \hline \RWAur{A} & 230.5 & 1.30 & Gaussian$^{b}$ & $27.6 \pm 0.5$ &
      $~~0.000 \pm 0.005 \times -0.067 \pm 0.007$ \\ & 112.5 & 2.66 &
      Point & $~8.0 \pm 0.3$ & $ -0.06 \pm 0.03 \times -0.07 \pm 0.02$
      \\ \hline \RWAur{B} & 230.5 & 1.30 & Point & $~5.2 \pm 0.4$ & $
      -1.42 \pm 0.03 \times -0.44 \pm 0.04$ \\ & 112.5 & 2.66 & Point
      & $~0.8 \pm 0.3$ & $ -1.34 \pm 0.28 \times -0.48 \pm 0.24$ \\
      \hline
    \end{tabular}}
    \medskip
$^a$ Quoted 1-$\sigma$ flux uncertainties only reflect
    thermal and phase noises. The absolute flux calibration accuracy is
    estimated to be 20\% (see text).\\ 
$^b$ Fitting an elliptical Gaussian perpendicular to the jet instead of
    a circular Gaussian does not significantly change the results.\\
    \label{tab:cont}
  \end{table}