\begin{table}%T8
\caption{Data for stars of different classes. For  $r$-I stars and stars not $n$-enhanced, see Paper~{II},  Burris et~al.~(\cite{burris2000}), and Fulbright~(\cite{fulbright2000}), although data are presented for some outliers of interest from Burris et~al. When several investigations exist, either the most reliable source or the mean of recent data has been taken. The mean of abundance ratios ${\rm [X/Y]}$, Y$\ne$Fe, was calculated from the mean of the abundances relative to Fe, and not from individual measurements of ${\rm [X/Y]}$. (:) indicates an insecure measurement, and such cases are not considered when calculating the means. References:
(1) This work,
(2) Aoki et~al.~(\cite{aoki2001}),
(3) Aoki et~al.~(\cite{aoki2002}),
(4) Barbuy et~al.~(\cite{barbuy2005}),
(5) Paper~{II}, 
(6) Unpublished preliminary result obtained in Paper~{II}, 
(7) Burris et~al.~(\cite{burris2000}),
(8) Cohen et~al.~(\cite{cohen2003}),
(9) Hill et~al.~(\cite{hill2000}),
(10) Hill et~al.~(\cite{hill2002}) and Plez et~al.~(\cite{plez2004}),
(11) Honda et~al.~(\cite{honda2004a}),
(12) Ivans et~al.~(\cite{ivans2005}),
(13) Johnson \& Bolte~(\cite{johnson2002}),
(14) Johnson \& Bolte~(\cite{johnson2004}),
(15) Jonsell et~al.~(\cite{jonsell2005}),
(16) Lucatello et~al.~(\cite{lucatello2003}),
(17) Preston \& Sneden~(\cite{preston2001}),
(18) Sivarani et~al.~(\cite{sivarani2004}),
(19) Sneden et~al.~(\cite{sneden2003}),
(20) Van Eck et~al.~(\cite{van_eck2003}),
(21) Zacs et~al.~(\cite{zacs1998}),
(22) mean of presented data,
(23) mean of (4) and (17).}
\label{Tstars}
\begin{tabular}{lllrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr}
\hline
\hline 
\multicolumn{18}{l}{$r+s$ stars} \\ [0.5ex]                                                           Name        & $T_{\rm eff}$ & $\log~g$&[Fe/H]&[C/Fe]&[Sr/Fe]&[Y/Fe]&[Zr/Fe]&[Ba/Fe]&[La/Fe]&[Ce/Fe]&[Eu/Fe]&[Pb/Fe]&[Ba/Eu]&[La/Eu]&[Ce/Eu]&[Pb/Ba]&Ref. \\  					\noalign{\smallskip}					 \hline
CS~22183-015 & 5200 & 2.5  & $-$3.12 & 2.2: &      & 0.45 & 0.62 & 2.09 & 1.59 & 1.55 & 1.39 & 3.17 & 0.70 & 0.20 & 0.16 & 1.08 & (13)  \\ %  Johnson & Bolte (2002) ApJ 579 L87						 
CS~22898-027 &      &      & $-$2.20 & 2.08 & 0.76 & 0.84 & 1.20 & 2.25 & 2.21 & 2.13 & 1.91 & 2.84 & 0.34 & 0.30 & 0.22 & 0.59 & (22) \\ %  mean						    
            & 6250 & 3.7  & $-$2.25 & 2.2  & 0.92 & 0.73 & 1.01 & 2.23 & 2.13 & 2.13 & 1.88 & 2.84 & 0.35 & 0.25 & 0.25 & 0.61 & (3)  \\ %  Aoki et~al. (2002), ApJ 580, 1149						    
            & 6300 & 4.0  & $-$2.15 & 1.95 & 0.60 & 0.95 & 1.39 & 2.27 & 2.28 &      & 1.94 &      & 0.33 & 0.34 &      &      & (17)  \\ %  Preston & Sneden (2001), AJ 122, 1545						    
CS~22948-027 &      &      & $-$2.52 & 2.27 & 0.90 & 1.00 &      & 1.97 & 2.32 & 2.20 & 1.88 & 2.72 & 0.09 & 0.44 & 0.32 & 0.75 & (23)  \\ %  mean ignoring Hill		 
            & 4800 & 1.8  & $-$2.47 & 2.43 & 0.90 & 1.00 &      & 2.26 & 2.32 & 2.20 & 1.88 & 2.72 & 0.38 & 0.44 & 0.32 & 0.46 & (4) \\ %  Barbuy et~al. (2005), A&A 429, 1031						    
            & 4600 & 0.8  & $-$2.57 & 2.10 &      &      &      & 1.67 &      &      &      &      &      &      &      &      & (17)  \\ %  Preston & Sneden (2001), AJ 122, 1545						    
            & 4800 & 1.80 & $-$2.46 & 1.8  & 0.90 & 1.00 &      & 2.26 & 2.32 & 2.20 & 2.10 &      & 0.16 & 0.22 & 0.10 &      & (9)  \\ %  Hill et~al. (2000), A&A 353, 557 						    
CS~29497-030 &      &      & $-$2.64 & 2.43 & 1.09 & 0.84 & 1.42 & 2.25 & 2.16 & 2.12 & 1.72 & 3.60 & 0.53 & 0.44 & 0.40 & 1.35 & (22)  \\ %  mean							 
            & 7000 & 4.1  & $-$2.57 & 2.47 & 1.34 & 0.97 & 1.40 & 2.32 & 2.22 & 2.10 & 1.99 & 3.65 & 0.33 & 0.23 & 0.11 & 1.33 & (12)  \\ %  Ivans et~al. (2005), ApJ 627 L145						 
            & 6650 & 3.5  & $-$2.70 & 2.38 & 0.84 & 0.71 & 1.43 & 2.17 & 2.10 & 2.14 & 1.44 & 3.55 & 0.73 & 0.66 & 0.70 & 1.38 & (18)  \\ %  Sivarani et~al. (2004), A&A 413, 1073						 
CS~29497-034 & 4800 & 1.8  & $-$2.90 & 2.63 & 1.00 & 1.10 &      & 2.03 & 2.12 & 1.95 & 1.80 & 2.95 & 0.23 & 0.32 & 0.15 & 0.92 & (4)  \\ %  Adopting Barbuy et~al. (2005), A&A 429, 1031						    
            & 4800 & 1.80 & $-$2.91 & 2.3  & 1.00 & 1.10 &      & 2.03 & 2.12 & 1.95 & 2.25 &      &$-$0.22 &$-$0.13 &$-$0.30 &      & (9)  \\ %  Hill et~al. (2000), A&A 353, 557 						    
CS~29526-110 & 6500 & 3.2  & $-$2.38 & 2.2  & 0.88 &      & 1.11 & 2.11 & 1.69 & 2.01:& 1.73 & 3.30 & 0.38 &$-$0.04 & 0.28 & 1.19 & (3)  \\ %  Aoki et~al. (2002), ApJ 580, 1149						 
CS~31062-012 & 6250 & 4.5  & $-$2.55 & 2.1  & 0.30 & 0.59 &      & 1.98 & 2.02 & 2.12 & 1.62 & 2.40 & 0.36 & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.42 & (3) \\ %  Aoki et~al. (2002), ApJ 580, 1149						    
CS~31062-050 &      &      & $-$2.37 & 2.00 & 0.91 & 0.48 & 0.94 & 2.55 & 2.28 & 2.02 & 1.82 & 2.86 & 0.73 & 0.46 & 0.20 & 0.31 & (22)  \\ %  mean	 
            & 5500 & 2.70 & $-$2.42 & 2.00 &      & 0.48 & 0.85 & 2.80 & 2.12 & 2.02 & 1.79 & 2.81 & 1.01 & 0.33 & 0.23 & 0.01 & (14)  \\ %  Johnson & Bolte (2004), ApJ 605, 462						    
            & 5600 & 3.0  & $-$2.32 & 2.00 & 0.91 &      & 1.02 & 2.30 & 2.44 & 2.10:& 1.84 & 2.90 & 0.46 & 0.60 & 0.26 & 0.60 & (3)  \\ %  Aoki et~al. (2002), ApJ 580, 1149						    
HE~0024$-$2523 & 6625 & 4.3  & $-$2.71 & 2.6  & 0.34 &$<$0.91 &$<$1.22 & 1.46 & 1.80 &      &$<$1.10 & 3.30 &$>$0.36 &$>$0.70 &      & 1.84 & (16) \\ %  Lucatello et~al. 2003, AJ 125, 875						 
HE~0131$-$3953 & 5928 & 3.83 & $-$2.71 & 2.45 & 0.46 &      &      & 2.20 & 1.94 & 1.93 & 1.62 &      & 0.58 & 0.32 & 0.31 &      & (5)  \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)								    
HE~0338$-$3945 & 6160 & 4.13 & $-$2.42 & 2.13 & 0.74 & 0.83 & 1.20 & 2.41 & 2.28 & 2.16 & 1.94 & 3.10 & 0.47 & 0.34 & 0.22 & 0.69 & (1) \\ %  Jonsell et~al., in preparation (HE~RES)						    
            & 6162 & 4.09 & $-$2.41 & 2.07 & 0.73 & 0.73 &      & 2.41 & 2.26 & 2.21 & 1.89 &      & 0.52 & 0.37 & 0.32 &      & (5)  \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)						    
HE~1046$-$1352 & 5540 & 3.0:  & $-$2.6:  & 2.2:  & 0.8:  & 0.5:  &      & 2.1:  & 1.8:  & 1.8:  & 1.4:  &      & 0.7:  & 0.4:  & 0.4:  &      & (6)  \\ %  *, Barklem et~al. (2005) (rejected)
HE~1105$+$0027 & 6132 & 3.45 & $-$2.42 & 2.00 & 0.73 & 0.75 &      & 2.45 & 2.10 &      & 1.81 &      & 0.64 & 0.29 &      &      & (5)  \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)								    
HE~1405$-$0822 & 5400 & 2.0:  & $-$2.1:  & 1.7:  &      & 0.6:  & 0.8:  & 1.8:  & 1.2:  & 1.3:  & 1.1:  &      & 0.7:  & 0.1:  & 0.2:  &      & (6) \\ %  *,Barklem et~al. (2005) (rejected), Sivarani et~al., prep. (HE~RES)		 
HE~2148$-$1247 & 6380 & 3.9  & $-$2.28 & 1.91 & 0.76 & 0.83 & 1.47 & 2.36 & 2.38 & 2.28 & 1.98 & 3.12 & 0.38 & 0.40 & 0.30 & 0.76 & (8)  \\ %  CoHE~n et~al. (2003), ApJ 588, 1082						    
LP~625$-$44    & 5500 & 2.8  & $-$2.71 & 2.1  & 1.15 & 0.99 & 1.34 & 2.74 & 2.46 & 2.27 & 1.97 & 2.55 & 0.77 & 0.49 & 0.30 & $-$0.19 & (2)  \\ %  Aoki et al 2001 ApJ 561, 346							    
LP~706$-$7     & 6000 & 3.8  & $-$2.74 & 2.15 & 0.15 & 0.25 &$<$1.16 & 2.01 & 1.81 & 1.86 & 1.40 & 2.28 & 0.61 & 0.41 & 0.46 & 0.27 & (2) \\ %  Aoki et al 2001 ApJ 561, 346					      
\hline
\multicolumn{18}{l}{$s$ stars} \\  [0.5ex]                                                                                                                                                                
Name        & $T_{\rm eff}$ & $\log~g$&[Fe/H] &[C/Fe]&[Sr/Fe]&[Y/Fe]&[Zr/Fe]&[Ba/Fe]&[La/Fe]&[Ce/Fe]&[Eu/Fe]&[Pb/Fe]&[Ba/Eu]&[La/Eu]&[Ce/Eu]&[Pb/Ba]&Ref. \\						\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
CS~22880-074 &      &      & $-$1.85 & 1.41 & 0.27 & 0.16 & 0.73 & 1.33 & 1.16 & 1.22 & 0.53 & 1.9  & 0.80 & 0.63 & 0.69 & 0.57 & (22)  \\ %  mean	
              & 5850 & 3.8  & $-$1.93 & 1.3  & 0.39 & 0.16 &      & 1.31 & 1.07 & 1.22 & 0.5  & 1.9  & 0.81 & 0.57 & 0.72 & 0.59 & (3)   \\ %  Aoki et~al. (2002), ApJ 580, 1149	
              & 6050 & 4.0  & $-$1.76 & 1.51 & 0.14 & 0.6: & 0.73 & 1.34 & 1.24 &      & 0.55 &      & 0.79 & 0.69 &      &      & (17)  \\ %  Preston & Sneden (2001), AJ 122, 1545	
CS~22881-036 & 6200 & 4.0  & $-$2.06 & 1.96 & 0.59 & 1.01 & 0.95 & 1.93 & 1.59 &      & 1.00 &      & 0.93 & 0.59 &      &      & (17)  \\ %  Preston & Sneden (2001), AJ 122, 1545						 
CS~22942-019 &      &      & $-$2.66 & 2.0  & 1.4  & 1.58 & 1.69 & 1.71 & 1.53 & 1.54 & 0.79 &$\le$1.6&0.92& 0.74 & 0.75 &$\le-$0.11 & (22)  \\ %  mean		
              & 5000 & 2.4  & $-$2.64 & 2.0  & 1.7: & 1.58 & 1.69 & 1.92 & 1.20 & 1.54 & 0.79 &$\le$1.6&1.13& 0.41 & 0.75 &$\le-$0.32 & (3)   \\ %  Aoki et~al. (2002), ApJ 580, 1149	
              & 4900 & 1.8  & $-$2.67 & 2.2: & 1.4  &      &      & 1.50 & 1.85 &      & 0.8: &      & 0.7: & 1.05:&      &      & (17)  \\ %  Preston & Sneden (2001), AJ 122, 1545	
CS~30301-015 & 4750 & 0.8  & $-$2.64 & 1.6  & 0.3: & 0.29 &      & 1.45 & 0.84 & 1.16 & 0.2:& 1.7  & 1.25:& 0.64:& 0.96:& 0.25 & (3)   \\ %  Aoki et~al. (2002), ApJ 580, 1149	
HD~196944    &      &      & $-$2.33 & 1.31 & 0.84 & 0.57 & 0.63 & 1.26 & 1.13 & 1.20 & 0.17 & 2.00 & 1.09 & 0.96 & 1.03 & 0.74 & (22)  \\ %  mean								 
            & 5250 & 1.7  & $-$2.23 &      &      &      &      & 1.14 &      &      &      &      &      &      &      &      & (15)  \\ %  Jonsell et~al. 2005							     
            & 5250 & 1.7  & $-$2.4  &      &      &      & 0.6  &      & 1.00 & 1.10 &      & 2.10 &      &      &      &      & (20)  \\ %  Van Eck et~al. (2003) A&A 404, 291						 
            & 5250 & 1.8  & $-$2.25 & 1.2  & 0.84 & 0.56 & 0.66 & 1.10 & 0.91 & 1.01 & 0.17 & 1.90 & 0.93 & 0.74 & 0.84 & 0.80 & (3)  \\ %  Aoki, W., Ryan, S. G., Norris, J. E., et~al. 2002, ApJ, 580, 1149		 
            & 5250 & 1.7  & $-$2.45 & 1.42 &      & 0.58 &      & 1.56 & 1.49 & 1.50 &      &      &      &      &      &      & (21)  \\ %  Zacs, L., Nissen, P. E., & Schuster, W. J. 1998 A&A, 337, 216			 
HE~0202$-$2204 & 5280 & 1.65 & $-$1.98 & 1.16 & 0.57 & 0.41 & 0.47 & 1.41 & 1.36 & 1.30 & 0.49 &      & 0.92 & 0.87 & 0.81 &      & (5)  \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)								 
HE~1135$+$0139 & 5487 & 1.80 & $-$2.33 & 1.19 & 0.66 & 0.36 & 0.46 & 1.13 & 0.93 & 1.17 & 0.33 &      & 0.80 & 0.60 & 0.84 &      & (5)  \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)			\hline
\multicolumn{18}{l}{$r$-II stars} \\  [0.5ex]                                                        Name        & $T_{\rm eff}$ & $\log~g$&[Fe/H]&[C/Fe]&[Sr/Fe]&[Y/Fe]&[Zr/Fe]&[Ba/Fe]&[La/Fe]&[Ce/Fe]&[Eu/Fe]&[Pb/Fe]&[Ba/Eu]&[La/Eu]&[Ce/Eu]&[Pb/Ba]&Ref. \\					\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
CS~22183-031 & 5270 & 2.80 &$-2.93$ & 0.42 & 0.10 & 0.21 &      & 0.38 &      &      & 1.16 &       &         &        &       &        &  (11) \\ % Honda 2004a ApJ 607, 474
CS~22892-052 & 4800 & 1.50 &$-$3.1  & 0.88 & 0.61 & 0.44 & 0.82 & 0.99 & 1.09 & 1.02 & 1.64 &$<$0.9  &$-$0.65 &$-$0.55 &$-$0.62&$<-$0.09& (19) \\ %  Adapt Sneden et~al. 2003 ApJ 591, 936
            & 4884 & 1.81 &$-$2.95 & 1.00 & 0.61 & 0.45 &      & 1.19 & 1.02 &      & 1.54 &      &$-$0.35 &$-$0.52 &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
CS~29491-069 & 5103 & 2.45 &$-$2.81 & 0.18 & 0.07 & 0.00 &      & 0.34 &      &      & 1.06 &      &$-$0.72 &      &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
CS~29497-004 & 5013 & 2.23 &$-$2.81 & 0.22 & 0.57 & 0.66 & 0.94 & 1.21 & 1.21 &      & 1.62 &      &$-$0.41 &$-$0.41 &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
CS~31082-001 & 4825 & 1.5  &$-$2.92 & 0.2  & 0.65 & 0.43 & 0.73 & 1.17 & 1.13 & 1.01 & 1.63 & 0.40 &$-$0.46 &$-$0.50 &$-$0.62 &$-$0.77 & (10) \\ %  Adopt Hill et~al. (2002), A&A 387, 560; Plez et~al. (2004), A&A 428, L9
            & 4922 & 1.90 &$-$2.78 & 0.22 & 0.53 & 0.56 & 0.89 & 1.18 & 1.18 & 1.06 & 1.66 &      &$-$0.48 &$-$0.48 &$-$0.60 &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
HE~0430$-$4901 & 5296 & 3.12 &$-$2.72 & 0.09 &$-$0.01 & 0.02 &      & 0.50 &      &      & 1.16 &      &$-$0.66 &      &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
HE~0432$-$0923 & 5131 & 2.64 &$-$3.19 & 0.24 & 0.47 & 0.51 & 0.88 & 0.72 &      &      & 1.25 &      &$-$0.53 &      &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
HE~1127$-$1143 & 5224 & 2.64 &$-$2.73 & 0.54 & 0.24 & 0.22 &      & 0.63 &      &      & 1.08 &      &$-$0.45 &      &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
HE~1219$-$0312 & 5140 & 2.40 &$-$2.81 &$-$0.08 & 0.20 & 0.29 & 0.65 & 0.51 & 0.91 &      & 1.41 &      &$-$0.90 &$-$0.50 &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
HE~2224+0143 & 5198 & 2.66 &$-$2.58 & 0.35 & 0.23 & 0.13 & 0.58 & 0.59 & 0.65 &      & 1.05 &      &$-$0.46 &$-$0.40 &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)
HE~2327$-$5642 & 5048 & 2.22 &$-$2.95 & 0.43 & 0.31 & 0.12 &      & 0.66 & 0.67 &      & 1.22 &      &$-$0.56 &$-$0.55 &      &      & (5) \\ %  Barklem et~al. (2005)    
\hline
\multicolumn{18}{l}{Outlier "normal'' stars} \\ [0.5ex]                                             Name        & $T_{\rm eff}$ & $\log~g$&[Fe/H]&[C/Fe]&[Sr/Fe]&[Y/Fe]&[Zr/Fe]&[Ba/Fe]&[La/Fe]&[Ce/Fe]&[Eu/Fe]&[Pb/Fe]&[Ba/Eu]&[La/Eu]&[Ce/Eu]&[Pb/Ba]&Ref. \\					\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
HD~13979     & 5075 & 1.90 & $-$2.26 &      &$-$0.07 &$-$0.63 &$-$0.34 &$-$0.50 &$-$0.10 &      &$-$0.38 &      &$-$0.12 & 0.28 &      &      & (7) \\ %  Burris et~al. 2000, ApJ 544, 302 
HD~25532     & 5300 & 1.90 & $-$1.46 &      & 0.14 &$-$0.28 & 0.14 & 0.17 &$-$0.07 &      & 0.10 &      & 0.07 &$-$0.17 &      &      & (7) \\ %  Burris et~al. 2000, ApJ 544, 302
HD~105546    & 5300 & 2.50 & $-$1.27 &      & 0.45 & 0.13 & 0.45 & 0.42 & 0.05 &      & 0.32 &      & 0.10 &$-$0.27 &      &      & (7) \\ %  Burris et~al. 2000, ApJ 544, 302
HD~166161    & 5150 & 2.20 & $-$1.30 &      & 0.20 & 0.31 & 0.43 & 0.53 & 0.36 &      & 0.10 &      & 0.43 & 0.26 &      &      & (7) \\ %  Burris et~al. 2000, ApJ 544, 302 
HD~218857    & 5125 & 2.40 & $-$1.86 &      & 0.01 &$-$0.17 & 0.00 & 0.03 &$-$0.36 &      &$-$0.23 &      & 0.26 &$-$0.13 &      &      & (7) \\ %  Burris et~al. 2000, ApJ 544, 302 
BD$+$11$^\circ$2998  & 5425 & 2.30 & $-$1.17 &      &$-$0.20 &$-$0.23 & 0.17 & 0.14 &$-$0.17 &      & 0.06 &      & 0.08 &$-$0.23 &      &      & (7) \\ %  Burris et~al. 2000, ApJ 544, 302
BD$+$17$^\circ$3248  & 5250 & 2.30 & $-$2.02 &      & 0.55 & 0.06 & 0.50 & 0.97 & 0.60 &      & 0.96 &      & 0.01 &$-$0.36 &      &      & (7) \\ %  Burris et~al. 2000, ApJ 544, 302
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}