Table 6: The measured angular sizes of B 2005+403 at different frequencies. Column 1 shows the observing frequency, Col. 2 the observing epoch, Col. 3 the major axis size of the fitted Gaussian component. In Col. 4 references for previously published data are given.
$\nu {\rm [GHz]}$ Epoch $\theta {\rm [mas]}$ Reference

0.61 Oct. 1986 $225 \pm 58$ Fey et al. (1989)

1.6 1998.14 $29.8 \pm 0.5$ this paper

1.66 Mar. 1986 $26.4 \pm 4.7$ Fey et al. (1989)

1.7 Jan. 1997 $31 \pm 0.8$ Desai & Fey (2001)

2.3 Jan. 1997 $17.6 \pm 0.5$ Desai & Fey (2001)

4.99 Oct. 1985 $3.5 \pm 0.4$ Fey et al. (1989)

5 1996.82 $3.5 \pm 0.1$ this paper

5 Jan. 1997 $3.4 \pm 0.1$ Desai & Fey (2001)

8 1996.83 $1.6 \pm 0.1$ this paper

15 1996.73 $0.8 \pm 0.1$ this paper

22 1996.73 $0.6 \pm 0.1$ this paper

43 1996.73 $0.5 \pm 0.04$ this paper

**Table 6:** The measured angular sizes of B 2005+403 at different frequencies. Column 1 shows the observing frequency, Col. 2 the observing epoch, Col. 3 the major axis size of the fitted Gaussian component. In Col. 4 references for previously published data are given.
$\nu {\rm [GHz]}$	Epoch	$\theta {\rm [mas]}$	Reference
0.61	Oct. 1986	$225 \pm 58$	Fey et al. (1989)
1.6	1998.14	$29.8 \pm 0.5$	this paper
1.66	Mar. 1986	$26.4 \pm 4.7$	Fey et al. (1989)
1.7	Jan. 1997	$31 \pm 0.8$	Desai & Fey (2001)
2.3	Jan. 1997	$17.6 \pm 0.5$	Desai & Fey (2001)
4.99	Oct. 1985	$3.5 \pm 0.4$	Fey et al. (1989)
5	1996.82	$3.5 \pm 0.1$	this paper
5	Jan. 1997	$3.4 \pm 0.1$	Desai & Fey (2001)
8	1996.83	$1.6 \pm 0.1$	this paper
15	1996.73	$0.8 \pm 0.1$	this paper
22	1996.73	$0.6 \pm 0.1$	this paper
43	1996.73	$0.5 \pm 0.04$	this paper

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text