All Tables

Table 1: Targets with $T_{\rm C}$ slopes larger than the average (2.4 $\pm$ 5.8 $\times$ 10^-5 dex K^-1) plus one standard deviation.
Table 2: Targets with $T_{\rm C}$ slopes lower than the average (2.4 $\pm$ 5.8 $\times$ 10^-5 dex K^-1) minus one standard deviation.
Table 3: Targets with $T_{\rm C}$ slopes more than 2 $\sigma$ above the comparison sample fit. The atmospheric parameters are taken from Santos et al. (2004b, 2005); the metallic abundances are from Ecuvillon et al. (2004a,b, 2006a) and Gilli et al. (2006). The Li and Be abundances are those from Israelian et al. (2004) and Santos et al. (2004c).
Table 4: Targets with $T_{\rm C}$ slopes more than 2 $\sigma$ below the fit. The atmospheric parameters are taken from Santos et al. (2004b, 2005) and the metallic abundances are from Ecuvillon et al. (2004a,b, 2006a) and Gilli et al. (2006). The Li and Be abundances are those published by Israelian et al. (2004) and Santos et al. (2004c).
Table 5: Planetary parameters of targets with $T_{\rm C}$ slopes more than 2 $\sigma$ above the comparison sample fit, from the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia (http://www.obspm.fr/encycl/encycl.html) compiled by Jean Schneider.
Table 6: Planetary parameters of targets with $T_{\rm C}$ slopes more than 2 $\sigma$ below the comparison sample fit, from the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia (http://www.obspm.fr/encycl/encycl.html) compiled by Jean Schneider.