Table 5: Summary of diameter and albedo determinations for Lutetia. Values in parentheses are calculated by the authors on the basis of Eq. (3) and H=7.35. NEATM results are quoted with 15 and 30% uncertainty in diameter and albedo, respectively; TPM results with 10% uncertainty in diameter and 20% uncertainty in albedo (see Sects. 3.2.2 and 3.3.2).
Source Diameter (km) p_V Notes

Tedesco (1992) $95.8\pm 4.1$ $0.221\pm 0.020$ Using the STM

Lupishko & Mohamed (1996) (142.4) 0.100 From polarimetry

Magri et al. (1999) $116\pm 17$ ( $0.151\pm 0.045$ ) From radar-observations

Present work $104\pm 16$ $0.188\pm 0.057$ NEATM fit to MIRSI data

Present work $102\pm 16$ $0.197\pm 0.059$ NEATM fit to IRAS data

Present work $94.9\pm 9.5$ $0.225\pm 0.045$ TPM fit to MIRSI data

Present work $98.3\pm 9.9$ $0.210\pm 0.042$ TPM fit to IRAS data

Present work $92.9\pm 9.3$ $0.235\pm 0.047$ TPM fit to MIRSI+IRAS

Present work $98.3 \pm 5.9$ $0.208 \pm 0.025$ Weighted average of rows 4--7

**Table 5:** Summary of diameter and albedo determinations for Lutetia. Values in parentheses are calculated by the authors on the basis of Eq. (3) and H=7.35. NEATM results are quoted with 15 and 30% uncertainty in diameter and albedo, respectively; TPM results with 10% uncertainty in diameter and 20% uncertainty in albedo (see Sects. 3.2.2 and 3.3.2).
Source	Diameter (km)	p_V	Notes
Tedesco (1992)	$95.8\pm 4.1$	$0.221\pm 0.020$	Using the STM
Lupishko & Mohamed (1996)	(142.4)	0.100	From polarimetry
Magri et al. (1999)	$116\pm 17$	( $0.151\pm 0.045$ )	From radar-observations
Present work	$104\pm 16$	$0.188\pm 0.057$	NEATM fit to MIRSI data
Present work	$102\pm 16$	$0.197\pm 0.059$	NEATM fit to IRAS data
Present work	$94.9\pm 9.5$	$0.225\pm 0.045$	TPM fit to MIRSI data
Present work	$98.3\pm 9.9$	$0.210\pm 0.042$	TPM fit to IRAS data
Present work	$92.9\pm 9.3$	$0.235\pm 0.047$	TPM fit to MIRSI+IRAS
Present work	$98.3 \pm 5.9$	$0.208 \pm 0.025$	Weighted average of rows 4--7

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text