\begin{table}%T3
\caption{ Comparison of various calculated $gf$-values for the present 
calculations with Cornille et~al. (\cite{Cornille92}), Sampson et~al. (\cite{Sampson91}), and 
Fawcett (\cite{Fawcett84}). }
\label{tab3}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{ c  c  c  c  c  c }
\hline\hline
 trans & $n=3$ & $n=4$ & Cornille & Sampson & Fawcett \\
\hline
 1--4  & 0.0197 & 0.0198 & 0.020 & 0.0172 & 0.021 \\
 1--5  & 0.2409 & 0.2419 & 0.247 & 0.2184 & 0.280 \\
 2--5  & 0.0063 & 0.0062 & 0.006 & 0.0056 & 0.007 \\
 1--6  & 0.0136 & 0.0136 & 0.010 & 0.0136 & 0.015 \\
 2--6  & 0.0004 & 0.0004 &   --   & 0.0004 &    --  \\
 1--10 & 0.0023 & 0.0024 & 0.003 & 0.0024 & 0.005 \\
 2--10 & 0.1789 & 0.1818 & 0.185 & 0.1646 & 0.200 \\
 1--43 & 0.0892 & 0.0887 & 0.057 & 0.0912 & 0.097 \\
 2--43 & 0.0093 & 0.0094 & 0.009 & 0.0108 & 0.008 \\
 1--58 & 0.2826 & 0.2683 & 0.284 & 0.2968 & 0.272 \\
 2--58 & 1.383  & 1.356  & 1.40  & 1.294  & 1.386 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}