Table 6: X-ray spectral fitting results for IRS 2, 1, 5, and R CrA: Absorbing column density and plasma temperature, with $1\sigma $ error margins.
  IRS 2   IRS 5   IRS 1   R CrA  
  $N_{\rm H}$ T $N_{\rm H}$ T $N_{\rm H}$ T $N_{\rm H}$ T
  [1022 cm-2] [MK] [1022 cm-2] [MK] [1022 cm-2] [MK] [1022 cm-2] [MK]
C1 $\rm 2.43^{+0.11}_{-0.10}$ $\rm 45.9^{+3.3}_{-3.3}$ $\rm 3.02^{+0.25}_{-0.22}$ $\rm 26.7^{+2.5}_{-2.3}$ $\rm 3.75^{+0.31}_{-0.27}$ $\rm 63.1^{+9.2}_{-6.6}$ - -
X1 $\rm 1.99^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ $\rm 27.6^{+1.7}_{-1.7}$ $\rm 3.50^{+0.15}_{-0.13}$ $\rm 30.2^{+1.2}_{-1.2}$ $\rm 4.60^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$ $\rm 28.7^{+1.4}_{-1.4}$ $\rm 1.2^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$ $\rm 106^{+209}_{-43}$
X2 $\rm 1.76^{+0.06}_{-0.06}$ $\rm 28.8^{+1.4}_{-1.4}$ $\rm 4.80^{+0.17}_{-0.15}$ $\rm 26.1^{+0.9}_{-0.9}$ $\rm 3.21^{+0.31}_{-0.26}$ $\rm 48.9^{+7.7}_{-6.0}$ $\rm 1.4^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$ $\rm 100^{+57}_{-26}$
X3 $\rm 1.60^{+0.15}_{-0.16}$ $\rm 36.5^{+5.7}_{-4.2}$ $4\rm .23^{+0.13}_{-0.12}$ $\rm 36.8^{+1.1}_{-1.1}$ $\rm 2.75^{+0.21}_{-0.18}$ $\rm 44.6^{+4.4}_{-4.3}$ $1.3^{\rm a} $ $\rm 110^{+145}_{-45}$
C2 $\rm 1.53^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$ $\rm 37.5^{+2.7}_{-2.6}$ $\rm 4.07^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ $\rm 33.3^{+1.4}_{-1.4}$ $\rm 2.36^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$ $\rm 32.6^{+1.7}_{-1.6}$ - -
a Frozen parameter, otherwise $N_{\rm H} = 2.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4} \times 10^{22}$ cm-2, T = 50+14-9 MK; however
this change appears unlikely since X3 is immediately following X2.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text