All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{3582f1a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{3582f1b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: The time evolution of $\alpha _{xx}$ ( left) and $\alpha _{yy}$ ( right) obtained with the running frame MR method with CP (the solid line) and without CP (the dash-dotted line) at two chosen cube heights.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{3582f2a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{3582f2b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: The time evolution of $\alpha _{zz}$ ( left) and $\beta _{xx}$ ( right) obtained with the running frame MR method with CP (the solid line) and without CP (the dash-dotted line) at two chosen cube heights.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{3582f3a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{3582f3b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: The time evolution of $\beta _{yy}$ ( left) and $\beta _{zz}$ ( right) obtained with the running frame MR method with CP (the solid line) and without CP (the dash-dotted line) at two chosen cube heights.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{3582f4.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: The comparison of the $\emf_y$ with the fitted curves obtained with MR methods with the running frame of 100 Myr calculated at the height of 400 pc as a function of time.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.6cm,clip]{3582f5a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=7.6cm,clip]{3582f5b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: The time evolution of $\emf_y$ at the height of 200 pc ( left) and 400 pc ( right) shown in three time intervals in which the MRC method is fitted (the black line). The dashed line shows the EMF reconstruction with the help of the averaged coefficients in the given time periods (see text for the explanation).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{3582f6.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 6: The comparison between different methods of estimation at z=200 pc. Dotted vertical lines designate boundaries of the single fitting regions. Fitting is performed in 3 time periods: 0-1370, 1370-1820, 1820-2300 Myr.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3582f7a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{3582f7b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 7: Integration of the magnetic field components B_x and B_y with the help of the reconstructed electromotive force for the different methods of estimation. The solid line represents mean magnetic field components computed from the simulation data, the dotted line represents integration of the BS02 fitted ${\cal E}$ , and the dashed line the MR fitted ${\cal E}$ . Additionally we include integration of the actual ${\cal E}$ obtained from the simulation data (gray dash dot line).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.7cm,clip]{3582f8a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} ... ...ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=5.7cm,clip]{3582f8h.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 8: The individual coefficients of $\hat{a}$ and $\hat{b}$ tensors as a function of harmonic number n obtained with the non-local formulation. The harmonic number n determines the value of k by Eq. (13).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582f9a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582f9b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 9: The time evolution of the kinematic ( left) and magnetic ( right) part of a_xx at two chosen heights of the cube.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582faa.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582fab.eps}\ \end{figure}$ Figure 10: The time evolution of the kinematic ( left) and magnetic ( right) part of a_yy at two chosen heights of the cube.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582fba.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582fbb.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 11: The time evolution of the kinematic ( left) and magnetic ( right) part of a_zz at two chosen heights of the cube.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.5cm,clip]{3582fca.eps}\hspace*{3mm} ... ...m}\includegraphics[width=6.5cm,clip]{3582fcc.eps}\hspace*{3.5cm}} \end{figure}$ Figure 12: The time evolution of the coefficients a_xx ( left), a_yy (in the middle) a_zz ( right) for the model at the height of 400 pc.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{3582f1a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{3582f1b.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: The time evolution of $\alpha _{xx}$ ( left) and $\alpha _{yy}$ ( right) obtained with the running frame MR method with CP (the solid line) and without CP (the dash-dotted line) at two chosen cube heights.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{3582f2a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{3582f2b.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: The time evolution of $\alpha _{zz}$ ( left) and $\beta _{xx}$ ( right) obtained with the running frame MR method with CP (the solid line) and without CP (the dash-dotted line) at two chosen cube heights.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{3582f3a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{3582f3b.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 3: The time evolution of $\beta _{yy}$ ( left) and $\beta _{zz}$ ( right) obtained with the running frame MR method with CP (the solid line) and without CP (the dash-dotted line) at two chosen cube heights.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{3582f4.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 4: The comparison of the $\emf_y$ with the fitted curves obtained with MR methods with the running frame of 100 Myr calculated at the height of 400 pc as a function of time.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.6cm,clip]{3582f5a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=7.6cm,clip]{3582f5b.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 5: The time evolution of $\emf_y$ at the height of 200 pc ( left) and 400 pc ( right) shown in three time intervals in which the MRC method is fitted (the black line). The dashed line shows the EMF reconstruction with the help of the averaged coefficients in the given time periods (see text for the explanation).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{3582f6.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 6: The comparison between different methods of estimation at z=200 pc. Dotted vertical lines designate boundaries of the single fitting regions. Fitting is performed in 3 time periods: 0-1370, 1370-1820, 1820-2300 Myr.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.7cm,clip]{3582f8a.eps}\hspace{3mm} ... ...ps}\hspace{3mm} \includegraphics[width=5.7cm,clip]{3582f8h.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 8: The individual coefficients of $\hat{a}$ and $\hat{b}$ tensors as a function of harmonic number n obtained with the non-local formulation. The harmonic number n determines the value of k by Eq. (13).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582f9a.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582f9b.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 9: The time evolution of the kinematic ( left) and magnetic ( right) part of a_xx at two chosen heights of the cube.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582faa.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582fab.eps}\ \end{figure}$	Figure 10: The time evolution of the kinematic ( left) and magnetic ( right) part of a_yy at two chosen heights of the cube.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582fba.eps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{3582fbb.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 11: The time evolution of the kinematic ( left) and magnetic ( right) part of a_zz at two chosen heights of the cube.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.5cm,clip]{3582fca.eps}\hspace{3mm} ... ...m}\includegraphics[width=6.5cm,clip]{3582fcc.eps}\hspace{3.5cm}} \end{figure}$	Figure 12: The time evolution of the coefficients a_xx ( left), a_yy (in the middle) a_zz ( right) for the model at the height of 400 pc.
Open with DEXTER