Table 1: Observationally inferred pulsar data. Note that in Esamdin et al. (2005) no value for $\beta$ is quoted. Also, we infer P₃ from their values of P₂ and using the relation for the drift rate $D (^\circ /P_1) = P_2(^\circ )/P_3(P_1)$ , which is a good approximation for this system, as it is nearly aligned. Positive and negative values are obtained due to the definition of drift rate.
PSR $\alpha (^\circ)$ $\beta (^\circ)$ P₁(s) P₃ (P₁) l $\tau_{\rm circ} (P_1)$ $\tilde{\omega}_{\rm circ}$

B0943+10 (Deshpande & Rankin 2001) 11.58 -4.29 1.09 1.87 20 37 0.973

B0826-34 (Gupta et al. 2004) 1-2 1 1.848 0.50 15 7.5 0.833

B0826-34 (Esamdin et al. 2005) 0.5 - 1.848 {+6, -7} 13 +78, -91 { 0.99, 1.01}

**Table 1:** Observationally inferred pulsar data. Note that in Esamdin et al. (2005) no value for $\beta$ is quoted. Also, we infer P₃ from their values of P₂ and using the relation for the drift rate $D (^\circ /P_1) = P_2(^\circ )/P_3(P_1)$ , which is a good approximation for this system, as it is nearly aligned. Positive and negative values are obtained due to the definition of drift rate.
PSR	$\alpha (^\circ)$	$\beta (^\circ)$	P₁(s)	P₃ (P₁)	l	$\tau_{\rm circ} (P_1)$	$\tilde{\omega}_{\rm circ}$
B0943+10 (Deshpande & Rankin 2001)	11.58	-4.29	1.09	1.87	20	37	0.973
B0826-34 (Gupta et al. 2004)	1-2	1	1.848	0.50	15	7.5	0.833
B0826-34 (Esamdin et al. 2005)	0.5	-	1.848	{+6, -7}	13	+78, -91	{ 0.99, 1.01}

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text