Table 1: Log of the spectroscopic observations.
SN RA Dec UT Date [R] or $g\hbox {$^\prime $ }$ UT Date of Telescope/ Grating/ Dispersion Slit (arcsec)/
  (2000) (2000) of Discovery mag$\dagger$ Spectroscopy Instrument Grism (Å/pix) Par. angle$\ddagger$
1999cj 10 14 02.46 -0 14 34.0$^\ast$ Apr. 17 [19.2] Apr. 19 WHT/ISIS R158B, R158R 1.6/2.9 1.0/no
1999ck 14 08 56.59 -0 05 50.7 Apr. 16 [21.9] Apr. 19 WHT/ISIS R158B, R158R 1.6/2.9 1.0/yes
1999dr 23 00 17.56 -0 05 12.5 Sep. 1 22.1 Sep. 12 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/no
1999dt 00 45 42.29 +0 03 22.2 Sep. 4 23.5 Sep. 12 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/no
1999du 01 07 05.94 -0 07 53.8 Sep. 8 22.8 Sep. 12 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/yes
1999du " " " " Oct. 2 NOT/ALFOSC #4 3.0 2.5/yes
1999dv 01 08 58.96 + 0 00 24.8 Sep. 9 21.8 Sep. 13 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/yes
1999dv " " " " Oct. 2 NOT/ALFOSC #4 3.0 1.0/yes
1999dw 01 22 52.80 -0 16 20.8 Sep. 7 24.1 Sep. 12 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/no
1999dx 01 33 59.45 +0 04 15.3 Sep. 8 22.2 Sep. 14 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/no
1999dy 01 35 49.53 +0 08 38.3 Sep. 8 21.7 Sep. 14 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/no
1999dz 01 37 03.24 +0 01 57.9 Sep. 8 23.4 Sep. 13 & 14 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/yes
1999ea 01 47 26.09 -0 02 07.2 Sep. 9 23.3 Sep. 13 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/no
1999gx 00 34 15.47 +00 04 26.2 Sep. 6 23.3 Sep. 13 WHT/ISIS R158R 2.9 1.5/yes
Notes:
$^\dagger$ Approximate magnitude at discovery.
$^\ddagger$ Parallactic angle.
$^\ast$ Note that, due to a typographic mistake, the dec. for SN 1999cj differs by 31.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ from the value given in Hardin et al. (1999).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text