Table 2: Summary of the 3- and 2-D shock-cloud simulations.
Run Geometry Res.^a ${\cal M}$ $\chi$ therm. cond.

& rad. losses

HY1 3-D cart. (x,y,z) 105 50 10 no

HY2 3-D cart. (x,y,z) 132 50 10 no

HTR30 2-D cyl. (r,z) 132 30 10 yes

HTR50 2-D cyl. (r,z) 132 50 10 yes

^a In number of zones per cloud radius, $r_{\rm cl}$ .

**Table 2:** Summary of the 3- and 2-D shock-cloud simulations.
Run	Geometry	Res.^a	${\cal M}$	$\chi$	therm. cond.
					& rad. losses
HY1	3-D cart. (x,y,z)	105	50	10	no
HY2	3-D cart. (x,y,z)	132	50	10	no
HTR30	2-D cyl. (r,z)	132	30	10	yes
HTR50	2-D cyl. (r,z)	132	50	10	yes

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Problem description and numerical scheme
	3 Results
	4 Discussion and concluding remarks
	References
	Online Material
	Appendix A: Spitzer's thermal conduction in the FLASH code
	Appendix B: Time-scales in terms of ${\cal M}$ and $\chi$