Table 1: The complex refraction indices, (n,k), for the bulk aluminum of a mirror sample were measured at three wavelengths. The best-fit values found from Fig. 3 ( 1st row) agree with the corresponding values given by Lide (1993) ( 2nd row).
518 nm 630 nm 777 nm

$(n, k)_{\rm meas}$ (0.84, 5.80) (1.44, 6.98) (2.94, 8.0)

$(n, k)_{\rm lit}$ (0.83, 6.30) (1.36, 7.58) (2.63, 8.59)

**Table 1:** The complex refraction indices, (n,k), for the bulk aluminum of a mirror sample were measured at three wavelengths. The best-fit values found from Fig. 3 ( *1st row*) agree with the corresponding values given by Lide (1993) ( *2nd row*).
	518 nm	630 nm	777 nm
$(n, k)_{\rm meas}$	(0.84, 5.80)	(1.44, 6.98)	(2.94, 8.0)
$(n, k)_{\rm lit}$	(0.83, 6.30)	(1.36, 7.58)	(2.63, 8.59)

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 The telescope model
	3 Properties of the telescope proper
	4 Properties of the coelostat
	5 Telescope matrix
	6 Summary
	References
	Online Material
	Appendix A: Mueller matrix of mirrors
	Appendix B: Mueller matrix of a window with a unidirectional stress distribution
	Appendix C: Beam geometry of the coelostat
	Appendix D: Test of the telescope model: image rotation
	Appendix E: Telescope matrix