Table 6: Final Li abundances as derived by using different sets of ${T}_{\rm eff}$ . The whole table is available on-line.
HIP bin [Fe/H] $\sigma $(Fe) log g EW $\pm$$1\sigma$ A(Li) $_{\rm LTE}$ A(Li) $_{\rm NLTE}$ $+1\sigma$ $-1\sigma$ A(Li) $_{\rm S98}$ A(Li) $_{\rm H97}$
    dex dex cm s-1 dex dex dex dex dex dex
Sample #1: the clean sample

911
  -1.84 0.15 4.50 30.8 3.5 2.117 2.112 0.042 0.067 2.200 2.191
3026   -1.25 0.07 3.85 45.0 6.0 2.428 2.418 0.078 0.086 2.573 2.567
3446   -3.50 0.10 4.50 27.0 3.9 1.973 1.986 0.074 0.076 2.045 2.048
3564   -1.27 0.15 3.50 35.2 3.5 2.011 2.054 0.056 0.076 2.244 2.008
8572   -2.51 0.01 3.85 27.0 1.4 2.257 2.236 0.026 0.027 2.239 2.257
...   ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Sample #2: the $\beta $ sample

484
  -1.23 0.15 3.00 12.1 3.5 0.953 1.101 ... ... 0.949 ...
3554   -2.87 0.15 3.00 17.7 3.5 1.018 1.153 0.087 0.104 1.044 1.238
4343   -2.08 0.15 3.00 9.1 3.5 0.766 0.912 0.150 0.219 0.878 0.680
8314 ? -1.68 0.09 4.00 27.0 3.0 2.378 2.337 0.053 0.058 2.262 2.523
13 749   -1.62 0.15 3.00 14.6 3.5 0.876 1.039 0.102 0.128 0.901 0.870
...   ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Sample #3: the ubvy sample

12 807
  -2.87 0.22 4.50 22.9 3.0 1.918 1.929 0.066 0.068 2.676 1.940
83 320   -2.56 0.15 3.50 <5.0 ... <1.265 <1.287 ... ... <1.603 1.167
87 062   -1.67 0.23 4.50 31.5 4.0 2.109 2.111 0.088 0.069 2.109 2.106
91 129 * -2.96 0.10 4.50 27.3 2.5 2.208 2.191 0.045 0.054 2.899 2.224
103 337   -2.07 0.15 3.00 25.8 3.5 1.025 1.197 0.069 0.072 1.179 0.877
...   ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
? Identifies a suspected binary (Latham et al. 2002; Carney et al. 1994, 2003).
* Identifies a confirmed single- or double-lined binary (from Latham et al. 2002; Carney et al. 1994, 2003).
Note that the complete version of the table (available only on-line) reports the complete legend of symbols and references.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text