Table 2:
Literature sources.
|
Authors |
R |
S/N |
T/g/Fea |
Noteb |
|
1. Ryan et al. (1996) |
38 000 |
>100 |
p/l/l |
O, T |
| 2. Ryan et al. (1999) |
40 000 |
>100 |
p/l/l |
T |
| 3. Ryan et al. (2001a,b) |
50 000 |
>100 |
p/l/l |
O, T |
| 4. Bonifacio & Molaro (1997) |
... |
... |
p/l/l |
T |
| 5. Pilachowski et al. (1993) |
30 000 |
>100 |
p/p/s |
O |
| 6. Hobbs & Thorburn (1991) |
30 000 |
>100 |
l/l/l |
O, T |
| 7. Thorburn (1994) |
28 000 |
>80 |
p/l/l |
O |
| 8. Molaro et al. (1995) |
... |
... |
p/l/l |
T |
| 9. Spite et al. (1996) |
... |
>80 |
p/p/s |
T |
| 10. Ryan & Deliyannis (1998) |
42 000 |
>70 |
p/p/s |
O |
| 11. Gutierrez et al. (1999) |
30 000 |
>100 |
... |
O |
| 12. Fulbright (2000) |
50 000 |
>100 |
s/s/s |
O |
| 13. Ford et al. (2002 ) |
50 000 |
>150 |
l/l/l |
O |
a
 /log g/[Fe/H]: l = literature; s = spectroscopy;
p = photometry.
b O = new set of observations; T = new
scale (with
Li EW collected from literature).
|
Source LaTeX |
All tables |
In the text
