Table 1: Subset of the data from Rauer et al. (2003) used for analysis with the ComChem model. The first column gives the date of the observation, $r_{\rm h}$ (negative for pre-perihelion) and $\Delta $ are the heliocentric and geocentric distance of the comet, the fourth column gives the telescope and instrument used, the fifth column denotes how many spectra have been averaged in the observing run, the sixth column shows the resulting total integration time, $\Delta \rho $ is the spatial resolution of the profiles and the last column lists comments on the observations.
Date $r_{\rm h}$ $\Delta $ Telescope/ Number of spectra Total int. time $\Delta \rho $ Comment
  [AU] [AU] Instr. averaged [s] 103[km]  
17.8.1996 -3.39 2.8 Danish 1.5/DFOSC 2 1800 7.86 $\rm C_3$ contaminated
2.10.1996 -2.86 3.0 Danish 1.5/DFOSC 2 1800 8.09  
23.11.1997 3.51 3.4 ESO 1.5/B&C 4 4800 18.8 not photometric
6.12.1997 3.66 3.5 Danish 1.5/DFOSC 6 5400 10.3 $\rm C_3$ contaminated
19.12.1997 3.78 3.6 ESO 1.5/B&C 3 3600 21.6  
20.1.1998 4.13 4.0 ESO 1.5/B&C 4 3900 23.7  
21.1.1998 4.14 4.0 Danish 1.5/DFOSC 4 3900 11.7 $\rm C_3$ contaminated
21.3.1998 4.74 4.8 ESO 1.5/B&C 3 2700 25.6  


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text