All Tables

Table 1: The 282 stars flagged as astrometric binaries ( Pr₁, Pr₂, Pr₃ < 0.05 and $F2_{{\rm TI}}< 2.37$ ; see text). Italicized entries identify the 122 stars passing the Pr₁, Pr₂ and Pr₃ tests at the more stringent 0.006% level, and $F2_{{\rm TI}}< 2.37$ .
Table 2: Detection rate (expressed in %) as a function of orbital period and parallax. The percentage is given along with its binomial error; the total number of stars in the bin is listed between parentheses. For $\varpi > 5$ mas and $100 \le P(\rm d) \le 3000$ , the detection rate comes close to 100% when removing SB2 systems, systems with composite spectra or with a poor-quality spectroscopic orbit.
Table 3: The 70 orbital solutions (Campbell solutions) passing all consistency tests. The column labelled "Ref.'' provides the reference for the spectroscopic orbit used. In the case where a system is listed in the DMSA/O annex, the column labelled "DMSA'' compares the orbital semi-major axes and the inclinations from the DMSA/O annex and from this work.
Table 4: The 31 new orbital solutions (Campbell solutions) passing the Pr₁, Pr₂ and Pr₃ tests at the 0.006% level, but failing at least one of the consistency tests. The column labelled "Ref.'' provides the reference for the spectroscopic orbit used. The columns labelled $\xi$ and $\epsilon$ provide the values of the corresponding empirical tests. The column labelled "D'' refers to DMSA.
Table 5: The 39 systems with a DMSA/O entry which do not fulfill the 2 tests assessing the reliability of the astrometric orbital elements, namely $\xi < 3$ and $\epsilon > 0.4$ and the probability tests at the 0.006% level (see text). Columns with "n'' correspond to failed tests.
Table 6: Masses and mass ratios for the 29 systems with main-sequence primaries passing all consistency tests.