$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f1t.eps}\vspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f1b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Comparison of the spatial dependence of the amplitude of the three-point function for both the convergence field ( top panel) and the shear field ( bottom panel). These results correspond to the one-halo model with $\alpha =-1$ . In this plot, $\vec{r}_{1}=(0,0)$ and $\vec{r}_{2}=(1,0)$ . As can be observed the spatial structure of the shear three-point function is much more complex than the one of the convergence field.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f3t.eps}\par\vspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f3b.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: Pattern of the $\xi _{3}$ field in the case of the one-halo model for l₃=1, $\alpha =-1$ ( top panel) and $\alpha =-0.5$ ( bottom panel). $\vec{r}_{1}=(0,0)$ and $\vec{r}_{2}=(1,0)$ . The level indicates the amplitude of this component of the shear correlation.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f2t.eps}\par\vspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f2b.eps} \par\end{figure}$	Figure 2: Comparison of the spatial dependence of the amplitude of the three-point function for $\alpha =-0.75$ ( top panel) and $\alpha =-0.5$ ( bottom panel).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f3t.eps}\par\vspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{3440f3b.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Pattern of the $\xi _{3}$ field in the case of the one-halo model for l₃=1, $\alpha =-1$ ( top panel) and $\alpha =-0.5$ ( bottom panel). $\vec{r}_{1}=(0,0)$ and $\vec{r}_{2}=(1,0)$ . The level indicates the amplitude of this component of the shear correlation.
Open with DEXTER