Table 2: Orion proplyds observational parameters: comparison with previous papers.

Paper
Total Common Max. $d_{\rm proj} \theta^{1}$ OriC $\langle R\rangle$ $r_{\rm IF}$ $r_{\rm disk}$
  IF disks IF disks ('') (pc) (%) (%) (%)

B98aa
40 21 34 19 70.0 0.15 (184-427) $43\pm18$ 30 14
O98b 22 - 20 - 70.0 0.15 (184-427) - 22 -
JHB98c 41 15 30 15 70.0 0.15 (184-427) $48\pm22$ 42 7
SH99d 10 10 10 10 56.7 0.12 (182-413) $48\pm20$ 55 70
B00e 24 24 18 18 176.3 0.38 (072-135) $44\pm17$ 2 8
a Bally et al. (1998a); b O'Dell (1998); c Johnstone et al. (1998); d Störzer & Hollenbach (1999); e Bally et al. (2000).
This table refers only to the sample of bright proplyds listed in previous papers and deliberately excludes the pure silhouettes. The second column refers to the total number of bright proplyds (here IF) and bright proplyds with embedded disks (here disks) listed in the papers. The third column refers to the subsample of objects that are common to our sample. $\langle R\rangle$ is the diameter ratio computed for the common sample of embedded disks. The maximum projected distances listed here are the ones measured in this paper assuming 1 pix $\sim $ 0. $^{\prime\prime}$1 = 45 AU and $d_{\rm Orion}$ = 450 pc; the differences between the different papers were negligible. The linear correlation coefficients $r_{\rm IF}$ and $r_{\rm disk}$ are represented by its square times 100%. Bally et al. (2000) makes reference to many other proplyds but, we just consider the 24 H$_\alpha$ emission bright proplyds with dark disks embedded.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text