... jet

Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory, La Silla, Chile (ESO programmes 070.C-0396(A), 070.C.-0396(B)).

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...

The appendices are only available in electronic form at http://www.edpsciences.org

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...2002)

Bally et al. (2002) named the knots in the jet from A$_{\rm J}$ to I$_{\rm J}$ in order of decreasing distance from VLA1. They also found two additional knots, A and B, close to knot G$_{\rm J}$ but at a different position angle, and thus probably belonging to a different jet.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... 3.67

In a note added in proof, Quinet et al. (1995) evaluated the limitations of their A_ij calculations done considering only three [Fe II] electronic configurations. While in general the inclusion of the additional 3d⁵4d² configuration does not change the radiative rates by more than few percent, for the explicit case of the a⁴F-a⁴D transitions (which includes the 1.64 $\mu$m transition) the correction is about 40%. If real, this would cause the 1.64/1.25 theoretical ratio to become again very similar to the 1.64/1.25 NS88 expected ratio.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.