![]() |
Figure 1:
The secular precession timescale relative to that at a semimajor
axis corresponding to the planet's outer 3:2 mean motion resonance (i.e.,
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The secular evolution of the complex eccentricity,
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
The eccentricities ( top) and pericentre orientations ( bottom) of planetesimals in an initially dynamically cold planetesimal disk at times from left to right of 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10 and 100
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The response of the spatial distribution of planetesimals orbiting with semimajor
axes in the range
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The same as Fig. 4 except for
planetesimals orbiting with semimajor axes in the range
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
The orbits of planetesimals at semimajor axes of 1.4, 1.45 and
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
The semimajor axes of planetesimals which have completed
0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 precession periods (solid lines) and 1.0 and 2.0 precession periods (dotted lines) at any given time after the introduction of an eccentric planet into a disk;
lower numbers of precession periods correspond to planetesimals further
from the planet. Times are given relative to the secular precession time at the 3:2 resonance,
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Orbits of planetesimals determined using a full numerical
integration involving 1000 planetesimals distributed between 110 and 200 AU
from a
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Width of the empty region,
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: Surface density image of the HD 141569 disk: a) observed density distribution reproduced from Fig. 8b of Clampin et al. (2003), but cropped so that the length of each side measures 800 AU; b) model density distribution (i) which fits the spiral at 325 AU assuming its structure is as outlined in Fig. 8a of Clampin et al., but assumes the star is at the centre of the disk and not where it was inferred to be from the images (the plus in a)); c) model density distribution (ii) which fits the spiral at 325 AU assuming that the position of the star is as inferred by Clampin et al. (2003). The two models (i) and (ii) are described in more detail in the text. The planet's orbit in these models is shown with a white line, the axes are in AU, and the position of the star shown with a plus. The orientation of all images is such that N is to the left, E is down. |
Open with DEXTER |