Table 5: Table containing a proposed mode identification for the observed frequencies given in Table 1, using the oscillations computed from different models. Values in parentheses correspond to the mode identification numbers ( $n,\ell ,m$ ). The first five models corresponds to those chosen by their proximity to the fundamental radial mode. The last five, corresponds to those chosen by minimum $\sigma ^2$ value. $\nu _i$ represent the theoretical frequencies closest to the observed ones.
$\nu_1$ $\nu_1^d$ $\nu_2$ $\nu_2^d$ $\nu_3$ $\nu_3^d$ $\nu_4$ $\nu_4^d$ $\nu_5$ $\nu_5^d$ $\sigma ^2$ $\sigma_{\rm d}^2$

m₁₈
(-1, 2, 0) (1, 0, 0) (1, 2, 2) (1, 2, 2) (2, 2, -1) (2, 2, -1) (-1, 2, 0) (-1, 2, 0) (-1, 2, -1) (-1, 2, -1) 16.937 5.698

m₁₉
(-2, 1, 0) (1, 0, 0) (3, 2, 2) (3, 2, 2) (4, 0, 0) (4, 0, 0) (-3, 2, -2) (-1, 1, 0) (-1, 1, -1) (-3, 2, -2) 12.531 4.056

m₂₀
(1, 0, 0) (-1, 2, 0) (1, 2, 2) (1, 2, 2) (2, 2, -1) (2, 2, -1) (-1, 2, 0) (-1, 2, 0) (-1, 2, -1) (-1, 2, -1) 4.575 4.544

m₃₉
(1, 0, 0) (1, 1, 0) (2, 2, 1) (2, 2, 1) (6, 2, 2) (2, 2, 0) (-2, 2, -1) (-2, 2, -1) (-2, 2, -1) (-2, 2, -1) 21.234 7.600

m₄₀
(1, 0, 0) (-1, 2, -2) (1, 2, 0) (1, 2, 0) (3, 1, 1) (3, 1, 1) (-1, 2, -2) (-1, 2, -2) (1, 1, 1) (1, 1, 1) 0.763 1.242

m₁₀
(-1, 1, 0) (-2, 2, 0) (3, 2, 2) (3, 2, 2) (4, 0, 0) (4, 0, 0) (-3, 2, -2) (-1, 1, 0) (-1, 1, -1) (-3, 2, -2) 1.194 0.820

m₁₃
(-1, 2, 0) (-1, 2, 0) (1, 2, 2) (1, 2, 2) (2, 2, -1) (2, 2, -1) (-1, 2, 0) (-1, 2, 0) (-1, 2, -1) (-1, 2, -1) 0.903 0.903

m₂₃
(-1, 2, -2) (-1, 2, -2) (3, 2, 2) (3, 2, 2) (4, 1, -1) (4, 1, -1) (0, 2, 0) (0, 2, 0) (0, 2, 0) (0, 2, 0) 0.835 0.835

m₃₄
(-1, 2, 0) (1, 1, 0) (2, 2, 1) (2, 2, 1) (6, 2, 2) (2, 2, 0) (-2, 2, -1) (-2, 2, -1) (-2, 2, -1) (-2, 2, -1) 1.698 1.228

m₅₈
(-1, 2, -2) (-1, 2, -2) (2, 1, 1) (2, 1, 1) (3, 1, -1) (3, 1, -1) (-1, 1, 1) (-1, 1, 1) (1, 1, 1) (1, 1, 1) 0.639 0.940

**Table 5:** Table containing a proposed mode identification for the observed frequencies given in Table 1, using the oscillations computed from different models. Values in parentheses correspond to the mode identification numbers ( $n,\ell ,m$ ). The first five models corresponds to those chosen by their proximity to the fundamental radial mode. The last five, corresponds to those chosen by minimum $\sigma ^2$ value. $\nu _i$ represent the theoretical frequencies closest to the observed ones.
	$\nu_1$	$\nu_1^d$	$\nu_2$	$\nu_2^d$	$\nu_3$	$\nu_3^d$	$\nu_4$	$\nu_4^d$	$\nu_5$	$\nu_5^d$	$\sigma ^2$	$\sigma_{\rm d}^2$
m₁₈	(-1, 2, 0)	(1, 0, 0)	(1, 2, 2)	(1, 2, 2)	(2, 2, -1)	(2, 2, -1)	(-1, 2, 0)	(-1, 2, 0)	(-1, 2, -1)	(-1, 2, -1)	16.937	5.698
m₁₉	(-2, 1, 0)	(1, 0, 0)	(3, 2, 2)	(3, 2, 2)	(4, 0, 0)	(4, 0, 0)	(-3, 2, -2)	(-1, 1, 0)	(-1, 1, -1)	(-3, 2, -2)	12.531	4.056
m₂₀	(1, 0, 0)	(-1, 2, 0)	(1, 2, 2)	(1, 2, 2)	(2, 2, -1)	(2, 2, -1)	(-1, 2, 0)	(-1, 2, 0)	(-1, 2, -1)	(-1, 2, -1)	4.575	4.544
m₃₉	(1, 0, 0)	(1, 1, 0)	(2, 2, 1)	(2, 2, 1)	(6, 2, 2)	(2, 2, 0)	(-2, 2, -1)	(-2, 2, -1)	(-2, 2, -1)	(-2, 2, -1)	21.234	7.600
m₄₀	(1, 0, 0)	(-1, 2, -2)	(1, 2, 0)	(1, 2, 0)	(3, 1, 1)	(3, 1, 1)	(-1, 2, -2)	(-1, 2, -2)	(1, 1, 1)	(1, 1, 1)	0.763	1.242
m₁₀	(-1, 1, 0)	(-2, 2, 0)	(3, 2, 2)	(3, 2, 2)	(4, 0, 0)	(4, 0, 0)	(-3, 2, -2)	(-1, 1, 0)	(-1, 1, -1)	(-3, 2, -2)	1.194	0.820
m₁₃	(-1, 2, 0)	(-1, 2, 0)	(1, 2, 2)	(1, 2, 2)	(2, 2, -1)	(2, 2, -1)	(-1, 2, 0)	(-1, 2, 0)	(-1, 2, -1)	(-1, 2, -1)	0.903	0.903
m₂₃	(-1, 2, -2)	(-1, 2, -2)	(3, 2, 2)	(3, 2, 2)	(4, 1, -1)	(4, 1, -1)	(0, 2, 0)	(0, 2, 0)	(0, 2, 0)	(0, 2, 0)	0.835	0.835
m₃₄	(-1, 2, 0)	(1, 1, 0)	(2, 2, 1)	(2, 2, 1)	(6, 2, 2)	(2, 2, 0)	(-2, 2, -1)	(-2, 2, -1)	(-2, 2, -1)	(-2, 2, -1)	1.698	1.228
m₅₈	(-1, 2, -2)	(-1, 2, -2)	(2, 1, 1)	(2, 1, 1)	(3, 1, -1)	(3, 1, -1)	(-1, 1, 1)	(-1, 1, 1)	(1, 1, 1)	(1, 1, 1)	0.639	0.940

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Fundamental parameters
	3 Modelling the star
	4 Comparison between theory and observations
	5 Conclusions
	References