Table 3: Idem Table 2 for $M=1.75~{M}_{\odot}$ models.
$\Omega$ ${T}_{{\rm eff}}$ $L/L_{\odot }$ $R/{R}_{\odot }$ g Age $\nu (\Pi _0)$ $\Pi_0/\Pi_1$ $\nu(\Pi_0^d)$ $(\Pi_0/\Pi_1)^d$

m₂₁
50 3.850 1.109 2.384 3.925 1211.3 126.616 0.773 126.598 0.772

m₂₂
100 3.849 1.105 2.383 3.926 1192.5 126.544 0.776 126.205 0.771

m₂₃
150 3.849 1.095 2.356 3.935 1144.2 128.588 0.782 126.980 0.757

m₂₄
200 3.849 1.077 2.311 3.952 1040.0 132.064 0.792 134.845 0.765

m₂₅
250 3.848 1.046 2.239 3.980 820.4 137.080 0.807 147.028 0.954

m₂₆
50 3.859 1.101 2.271 3.967 1133.8 136.626 0.773 136.584 0.773

m₂₇
100 3.859 1.094 2.248 3.976 1094.9 138.732 0.777 138.042 0.773

m₂₈
150 3.860 1.081 2.209 3.992 1027.5 142.391 0.783 139.861 0.769

m₂₉
200 3.859 1.062 2.167 4.008 911.0 146.203 0.792 140.219 0.735

m₃₀
250 3.859 1.037 2.106 4.033 727.6 151.842 0.803 151.842 0.756

m₃₁
50 3.870 1.087 2.124 4.026 1013.7 151.508 0.773 151.667 0.774

m₃₂
100 3.868 1.082 2.135 4.021 999.0 150.273 0.777 148.854 0.769

m₃₃
150 3.870 1.066 2.073 4.047 898.2 157.023 0.783 153.231 0.764

m₃₄
200 3.869 1.045 2.035 4.063 768.6 161.177 0.792 154.113 0.758

m₃₅
250 3.869 1.025 1.982 4.086 616.2 167.403 0.799 157.393 0.751

m₃₆
50 3.880 1.071 1.991 4.082 880.3 167.222 0.773 167.240 0.773

m₃₇
100 3.880 1.061 1.967 4.093 823.0 170.376 0.776 170.733 0.783

m₃₈
150 3.879 1.048 1.951 4.100 755.7 172.435 0.782 174.374 0.807

m₃₉
200 3.880 1.020 1.878 4.132 555.0 182.397 0.792 185.953 0.848

m₄₀
250 3.878 1.012 1.878 4.133 497.4 182.263 0.796 187.153 0.866

**Table 3:** Idem Table 2 for $M=1.75~{M}_{\odot}$ models.
	$\Omega$	${T}_{{\rm eff}}$	$L/L_{\odot }$	$R/{R}_{\odot }$	g	Age	$\nu (\Pi _0)$	$\Pi_0/\Pi_1$	$\nu(\Pi_0^d)$	$(\Pi_0/\Pi_1)^d$
m₂₁	50	3.850	1.109	2.384	3.925	1211.3	126.616	0.773	126.598	0.772
m₂₂	100	3.849	1.105	2.383	3.926	1192.5	126.544	0.776	126.205	0.771
m₂₃	150	3.849	1.095	2.356	3.935	1144.2	128.588	0.782	126.980	0.757
m₂₄	200	3.849	1.077	2.311	3.952	1040.0	132.064	0.792	134.845	0.765
m₂₅	250	3.848	1.046	2.239	3.980	820.4	137.080	0.807	147.028	0.954
m₂₆	50	3.859	1.101	2.271	3.967	1133.8	136.626	0.773	136.584	0.773
m₂₇	100	3.859	1.094	2.248	3.976	1094.9	138.732	0.777	138.042	0.773
m₂₈	150	3.860	1.081	2.209	3.992	1027.5	142.391	0.783	139.861	0.769
m₂₉	200	3.859	1.062	2.167	4.008	911.0	146.203	0.792	140.219	0.735
m₃₀	250	3.859	1.037	2.106	4.033	727.6	151.842	0.803	151.842	0.756
m₃₁	50	3.870	1.087	2.124	4.026	1013.7	151.508	0.773	151.667	0.774
m₃₂	100	3.868	1.082	2.135	4.021	999.0	150.273	0.777	148.854	0.769
m₃₃	150	3.870	1.066	2.073	4.047	898.2	157.023	0.783	153.231	0.764
m₃₄	200	3.869	1.045	2.035	4.063	768.6	161.177	0.792	154.113	0.758
m₃₅	250	3.869	1.025	1.982	4.086	616.2	167.403	0.799	157.393	0.751
m₃₆	50	3.880	1.071	1.991	4.082	880.3	167.222	0.773	167.240	0.773
m₃₇	100	3.880	1.061	1.967	4.093	823.0	170.376	0.776	170.733	0.783
m₃₈	150	3.879	1.048	1.951	4.100	755.7	172.435	0.782	174.374	0.807
m₃₉	200	3.880	1.020	1.878	4.132	555.0	182.397	0.792	185.953	0.848
m₄₀	250	3.878	1.012	1.878	4.133	497.4	182.263	0.796	187.153	0.866

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Fundamental parameters
	3 Modelling the star
	4 Comparison between theory and observations
	5 Conclusions
	References