![]() |
Figure 1: Map of the central Hydra cluster, with distances relative to NGC 3311. Large squares are the observed VLT fields, the field number is indicated in the lower right corner of each square. Dots are all Hydra cluster member galaxies from the spectroscopic study of Christlein & Zabludoff (2003). Galaxies marked with large circles are the ones for which we present new SBF measurements in this paper. The cluster members without SBF measurement are 11 late-type and 8 early-type galaxies. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Plots illustrating the effect of the window function effect. Upper panels: the inner ring of NGC 3311. Lower panels: galaxy 258 in field 1. Left panels: mask image used to blend out contaminating sources and restrict the measurement region. Masked regions are black. Middle panels: power spectrum of the mask on the left image. Right panels: filled circles: power spectrum of an isolated star, normalised to unity at wavenumber k=0. Crosses: the same power spectrum convolved with the mask power spectrum from the middle panels. The convolved power spectrum is lower than the non-convolved one by about 0.2 mag for NGC 3311 and about 0.4 mag for galaxy 258, corresponding to the values derived with the SBF simulations (see Table 4 and Sect. 2.2.1). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Incompleteness corrected globular cluster luminosity functions of the four indicated galaxies in the rings where SBF were measured. Asterisks with error bars are counts in the I-band, filled squares are counts in the V-band shifted to I assuming (V-I)=1.04 from Kundu & Whitmore (2001). The number counts are corrected for background contamination and shown up to the faintest magnitude bin for which the completeness was above 50%. The solid lines are Gaussian fits, whose parameters are the mean of the values fit independently in V and I. The derived turnover magnitudes and specific frequencies SN are given in Table. 3. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
CMB rest-frame radial velocity
is plotted vs. SBF distance for
the Hydra galaxies investigated in this paper (filled circles) and the revised Centaurus galaxies from Mieske & Hilker (2003) (open circles).
The solid line gives the Hubble flow
for
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Left panels: distance modulus
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Positions in super-galactic
coordinates
of the following objects: Great Attractor (GA) according to
Tonry et al. (2000, T00 in the following) as filled circle; Hydra cluster as open circle
at ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Comparison between expected and measured CMB radial velocities for four different GA distances of 43, 45, 47 and 49 Mpc. The x-axes indicates the different projected GA positions from Fig. 6. Filled circles: expected CMB radial velocity for the Centaurus cluster based on the flow model by Tonry et al. (2000), using the Centaurus distance of this paper. Crosses: expected CMB radial velocities for Hydra, using the Hydra distance of this paper. Open squares: expected CMB radial velocities for Hydra assuming a 15% higher Hydra distance of 47 Mpc. Filled triangles: expected CMB radial velocities for Centaurus assuming a 15% lower Centaurus distance of 39 Mpc. Error bars have been omitted for these two sets of expected velocities. Upper horizontal solid line: CMB rest-frame radial velocity of the Hydra cluster (Christlein & Zabludoff 2003). Lower horizontal solid line: CMB rest-frame radial velocity of the Centaurus cluster (Stein et al. 1997). The dashed horizontal lines indicate the respective error ranges. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Face-on view towards a plane defined by the positions of Centaurus, Hydra and the Sun, with the Sun being the origin. We assume
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Literature comparison of distances to the Hydra cluster. Numbers refer to the following sources: 1 SBF distance from this paper; 2 mean I-band SBF distance to NGC 3309 and NGC 3311 from Blakeslee et al. (2002, and priv. comm.); 3 mean FP distance to NGC 3309 and NGC 3311 from Blakeslee et al. (2002); 4 mean K-band SBF distance to NGC 3309 and NGC 3311 from Jensen et al. (1999); 5 NICMOS F160W SBF-distance to NGC 3309 from Jensen et al. (2001) using the revised calibration by Jensen et al. (2003); 6 FP distance to Hydra cluster from Hudson et al. (2004), open symbol refers to the distance when including the Mg2 term in the FP-relation fit. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Deredenned colour (V-I)0 plotted vs. apparent fluctuation
magnitude
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |