Table 2: Optical imaging observations.
Run Telescope Instrument Time span CCD Pixel size No. of pixels

[yrs] [ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ ]

I1 NTT 3.5 m EFOSC 2 1989 #05 0.2578 $512\times 320$

I2 ESO 3.6 m EFOSC 1 1989-1991 #08 0.3375 $1024\times 640$

I3 ESO 3.6 m EFOSC 1 1991-1993 #26 0.6094 $512\times 512$

I4 ESO/MPI 2.2 m EFOSC 2 1991 #05 0.3500 $512\times 320$

I5 ESO/MPI 2.2 m EFOSC 2 1991 #19 0.3340 $1024\times 1024$

I6 Danish 1.5 m DFOSC 1996 Loral 0.3800 $2052\times 2052$

**Table 2:** Optical imaging observations.
Run	Telescope	Instrument	Time span	CCD	Pixel size	No. of pixels
			[yrs]		[ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ ]
I1	NTT 3.5 m	EFOSC 2	1989	#05	0.2578	$512\times 320$
I2	ESO 3.6 m	EFOSC 1	1989-1991	#08	0.3375	$1024\times 640$
I3	ESO 3.6 m	EFOSC 1	1991-1993	#26	0.6094	$512\times 512$
I4	ESO/MPI 2.2 m	EFOSC 2	1991	#05	0.3500	$512\times 320$
I5	ESO/MPI 2.2 m	EFOSC 2	1991	#19	0.3340	$1024\times 1024$
I6	Danish 1.5 m	DFOSC	1996	Loral	0.3800	$2052\times 2052$

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Observations
	3 Comments on individual systems
	4 Conclusions
	References
	Online Material