Table 4: Summary of the observed fluxes and errors of the UC H II region G268.42-0.85. As the error of the NIR photometry, we give the statistical error of the PSF fit. The last but one column indicates if the given flux density was included in the SED fitting (see Sect. 3.5). Notes: ^a PSF-Fit; ^b filter centered on Br $\alpha$ ; ^c narrow-band filter; ^d flux standard star not detected, only lower limit can be given. References: ¹ this paper; ² Egan et al. (1999); ³ Ghosh et al. (2000); ⁴ Walsh et al. (1998).
Wavelength Flux Error Photometric aperture Instrument SED Note

$\mu$ m [Jy] Radius [ $^{\prime\prime}$ ] Fit? Ref.

1.6 1.1 $\times$ 10^-4 $\pm$ 12% 1.02^a ISAAC SWI No ¹

2.2 1.5 $\times$ 10^-2 ^+3.5_-2% 1.02^a ISAAC SWI No ¹

3.78 0.53 $\simeq$ 8% 4.6 ISAAC LWI No ¹

4.09 1.175 $\simeq$ 11% 4.6 ISAAC LWI No $^{1,\;b}$

4.66 0.95 $\simeq$ 8% 4.6 ISAAC LWI No $^{1,\;c}$

11.9 10.52 $\simeq$ 10% 4.6 TIMMI2 No ¹

12.9 10.7 $\simeq$ 10% 5.5 TIMMI2 No ¹

20 >29.5 - 0.8 TIMMI2 No $^{1,\;d}$

8.28 30.74 $\pm$ 5% PSF-Fit MSX A No ²

12 203 $\pm$ 9% 90 IRAS No ³

12.13 103.3 $\pm$ 3% PSF-Fit MSX C Yes ²

14.65 188.8 $\pm$ 4% PSF-Fit MSX D Yes ²

21.34 1301 $\pm$ 6% PSF-Fit MSX E Yes ²

25 2577 $\pm$ 4% 90 IRAS No ³

60 13611 $\pm$ 8% 90 IRAS Yes ³

100 14057 $\pm$ 8% 90 IRAS Yes ³

148 9127 - 90 TIFR Yes ³

209 4753 - 90 TIFR Yes ³

1.2 mm 17.0 $\pm$ 20% 60 SEST Yes ¹

3.5 cm 2.67 $\pm$ 10% 5 ATCA No $^{1,\;4}$

**Table 4:** Summary of the observed fluxes and errors of the UC H II region G268.42-0.85. As the error of the NIR photometry, we give the statistical error of the PSF fit. The last but one column indicates if the given flux density was included in the SED fitting (see Sect. 3.5). Notes: ^a PSF-Fit; ^b filter centered on Br $\alpha$ ; ^c narrow-band filter; ^d flux standard star not detected, only lower limit can be given. References: ¹ this paper; ² Egan et al. (1999); ³ Ghosh et al. (2000); ⁴ Walsh et al. (1998).
Wavelength	Flux	Error	Photometric aperture	Instrument	SED	Note
$\mu$ m	[Jy]		Radius [ $^{\prime\prime}$ ]		Fit?	Ref.
1.6	1.1 $\times$ 10^-4	$\pm$ 12%	1.02^a	ISAAC SWI	No	¹
2.2	1.5 $\times$ 10^-2	^+3.5_-2%	1.02^a	ISAAC SWI	No	¹
3.78	0.53	$\simeq$ 8%	4.6	ISAAC LWI	No	¹
4.09	1.175	$\simeq$ 11%	4.6	ISAAC LWI	No	$^{1,\;b}$
4.66	0.95	$\simeq$ 8%	4.6	ISAAC LWI	No	$^{1,\;c}$
11.9	10.52	$\simeq$ 10%	4.6	TIMMI2	No	¹
12.9	10.7	$\simeq$ 10%	5.5	TIMMI2	No	¹
20	>29.5	-	0.8	TIMMI2	No	$^{1,\;d}$
8.28	30.74	$\pm$ 5%	PSF-Fit	MSX A	No	²
12	203	$\pm$ 9%	90	IRAS	No	³
12.13	103.3	$\pm$ 3%	PSF-Fit	MSX C	Yes	²
14.65	188.8	$\pm$ 4%	PSF-Fit	MSX D	Yes	²
21.34	1301	$\pm$ 6%	PSF-Fit	MSX E	Yes	²
25	2577	$\pm$ 4%	90	IRAS	No	³
60	13611	$\pm$ 8%	90	IRAS	Yes	³
100	14057	$\pm$ 8%	90	IRAS	Yes	³
148	9127	-	90	TIFR	Yes	³
209	4753	-	90	TIFR	Yes	³
1.2 mm	17.0	$\pm$ 20%	60	SEST	Yes	¹
3.5 cm	2.67	$\pm$ 10%	5	ATCA	No	$^{1,\;4}$

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Observations and data reduction
	3 Results
	4 Global picture and summary
	References