Table 3: Summary of projected rotational velocities (1$\sigma $ detection limit) and stellar parameters of all stars from this paper and Papers I and II.
WD $T_{{\rm eff}}$ $\log g$ $v_0 \sin i$ $v_{\rm max}\sin i$ Ref.WD $T_{{\rm eff}}$ $\log g$ $v_0 \sin i$ $v_{\rm max}\sin i$ Ref.
1710+683 6825 7.94 72 +11-10   III1919+145 14 600 8.09   <6 II
0807+484 7000 8.01   <18 III0352+096 14 770 8.16   <13 I
2253-081 7160 8.43 36 +15-7   III2007-303 15 150 7.86   <7 II
0251-008 7700 8.05 24 +4-5   III0406+169 15 190 8.30   <20 I
1953-011 7950 8.41 $173\pm10^b$   II0810+234 15 220 7.99   <16 III
2359-434d,e 8850 8.57   <20 II1143+321 15 489 7.97   <2 I
0518+333f 9140 8.30   <7 III0310-688 15 700 8.16   <4 II
1510+566 9280 7.98   <11 III0220+222 15 840 7.95   <9 III
2258+406 9860 8.20 20 +6-5   III2039-682 16 050 8.44 $78\pm6$b   II
2115-560 9950 8.13   <35 II      $82\pm5$   M&M
0906+296 10 000 7.86 41 +6-5   III0413-077 16 570 7.86   <1 I
2007-219d 10 000 8.18   <20 II0836+201 16 630 8.04 $66\pm14$   III
1840-111d 10 230 8.18   <20 II0837+199 17 100 8.32   <9 I
1147+255 10 260 8.12 $24\pm{7}$   III2149+021 17 650 7.99 $16\pm5$ <21 II
0030+444 10 440 8.02 27 +5-4   III0047-524 18 750 7.83 $1\pm11$ <12 II
2105-820 10 760 8.25 $65\pm5^b$   II1211+392 18 800 7.70   <18 III
1544-377d 11 250 8.09   <20 II1531-022 18 850 8.39 $50\pm6$b   II
2326+049a 11 600 8.05 $45\pm5$   II2039-202 19 350 7.95   <15 II
1422+095a 11 950 7.87 $29\pm7$   II1943+163 19 400 7.80 $16\pm8$ <24 II
1240+754 12 000 7.96 30 +7-10   III0421+162 19 570 8.09   <8 I
1425-811a 12 200 7.99 $38\pm3$   II2032+248 19 900 7.87 $11\pm5$ <16 II
0921+354a 12 830 7.92 36 +7-5   III0431+125 21 340 8.04 15 +7-5   I
0726+393 13 600 7.76   <7 I0836+197 21 900 8.45   <22 I
1706+332 13 600 7.79 23 +3-4   III1620-391 24 250 8.05   <8 II
1716+020 13 620 7.79   <11 III0425+168 24 420 8.11   <18 I
1827-106 13 800 7.61   <20 II2014-575 26 850 7.80   <14 II
1743-132 13 950 7.71 28 +3-4c   III0438+108 27 390 8.07   <14 I
1911+135 14 040 7.83   <2 I1615-154 29 600 7.95   <13 II
           1314+293 49 000 7.70   <11 I

Paper I: Heber et al. (1997).
b broadening probably caused by a magnetic field.
Paper II: Koester et al. (1998).c $v \sin i = 13$ km s-1 (Paper II).
Paper III: this Paper.d poor fit (see Paper II).
M&M: Maxted & Marsh (1999).e possibly magnetic.
a Known ZZ Ceti variable star.f probably binary.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text