![]() |
Figure 1:
Structure of the adopted GDCE model (not to scale). Aiis the abundance of element i. The indices 1 and 2 represent the
prompt and delayed contributions, respectively. The indices s,
c,
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Metallicity distribution of G dwarfs in the solar
neighbourhood, where
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: [Th/Eu] vs. [Fe/H] diagram for all sample stars. Curves were calculated using our GDCE model for the four different Galactic disk ages shown in the legend. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Determination of Galactic disk age that best fits our
stellar [Th/Eu] abundance ratio data. Points are the total
deviations between each curve and the stellar data presented in
Fig. 4, calculated according to
Eq. (8). The curve is a
2nd order polynomial fit. The vertical line marks
the polynomial minimum, corresponding to best Galactic disk age
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Galactic disk age distribution obtained through a Monte Carlo simulation of the [Th/Eu] and [Fe/H] abundance ratio uncertainties. Simulation results have been counted in 0.5 Gyr bins, and N is the total count per bin. The vertical line marks the age at which the distribution was cut (125 Gyr), corresponding to a count fall below 100 (i.e., 10% uncertainty). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Integrands of Eqs. (9) and (10), used to calculate the variance and the mean absolute deviation (MAbD) of the age distribution,respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |