![]() |
Figure 1:
Comparison of equivalent widths obtained using Gaussian and Voigt
profiles for the star ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Comparison between a portion (around Ca I 6162 Å) of the ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Abundance patterns for the program stars, determined from Method 1 (filled circles) and Method 2 (open circles). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Comparison between the abundance ratio of the ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: [Fe/H] as a function of peculiar space velocities for Method 1 for the stars in our sample. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Diagrams used to estimate ages for our program stars (Method 1). The
theoretical isochrones are taken from Yi et al. (2003). The metallicities of the isochrones refer to a solar
iron abundance:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Comparison of the gravities derived by Method 1 with the values given by the theoretical isochrones. The error bars for the theoretical gravities were derived from the uncertainties in the position of the stars in the HR diagrams. |
Open with DEXTER |