Table 1: Correlation coefficients, $r_{\rm c}$ , and slopes of the linear fits to the scatter plots of modelled total solar irradiance based on SPM data vs. composite and ACRIM II measurements for different time periods.
Comparison Time period $r_{\rm c}$ Slope

Reconstr. vs. composite 1992-2003 0.94 $1.003 \pm 0.080$

Reconstr. vs. composite 1992-1996 0.86 $0.932 \pm 0.022$

Reconstr. vs. composite 1996-2003 0.93 $1.018 \pm 0.011$

Reconstr. vs. ACRIM II 1992-2001 0.84 $1.006 \pm 0.017$

Reconstr. vs. ACRIM II 1992-1996 0.78 $1.049 \pm 0.034$

Reconstr. vs. ACRIM II 1996-2001 0.81 $0.958 \pm 0.023$

ACRIM II vs. VIRGO 1996-2001 0.89 $1.046 \pm 0.013$

**Table 1:** Correlation coefficients, $r_{\rm c}$ , and slopes of the linear fits to the scatter plots of modelled total solar irradiance based on SPM data vs. composite and ACRIM II measurements for different time periods.
Comparison	Time period	$r_{\rm c}$	Slope
Reconstr.	vs.	composite	1992-2003	0.94	$1.003 \pm 0.080$
Reconstr.	vs.	composite	1992-1996	0.86	$0.932 \pm 0.022$
Reconstr.	vs.	composite	1996-2003	0.93	$1.018 \pm 0.011$
Reconstr.	vs.	ACRIM II	1992-2001	0.84	$1.006 \pm 0.017$
Reconstr.	vs.	ACRIM II	1992-1996	0.78	$1.049 \pm 0.034$
Reconstr.	vs.	ACRIM II	1996-2001	0.81	$0.958 \pm 0.023$
ACRIM II	vs.	VIRGO	1996-2001	0.89	$1.046 \pm 0.013$

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Data
	3 Model
	4 Results
	5 Conclusions
	References