- ... NGC 1808
- Based on observations made with ESO Telescopes at the Paranal Observatory under programme ID 68.B-0264(A).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
respectively
- These filters are both 0.05
m wide and
have very similar spectral responses relative to their central
wavelengths. The overall instrumental
response to a flat continuum source is the same for both filters.
Further, the NB_3.28 filter is
well matched to both the shape of the PAH feature and to the redshift
of the sources considered here. Indeed, it is with these criteria in
mind that the source selection was made.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
1.5
- http://www.eso.org/instruments/isaac/drg/html/drg.html
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
- As we show in Sect. 4.4
there is also a strong morphological correspondence between the lower
surface brightness PAH feature emission and the extended H
emission.
Thus the lack of Pa
emission at the position of the extended PAH feature emission likely is due to the depth of the exposure at Pa
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... emission
- In the interest of clarity, we
have not shown K-band contours in Fig. 4. For
these contours the reader is referred to Fig. 2 (right) of TGSE96.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... position
- Kalas and Wynn-Williams use
the mean of the emission at 3.18
m and 3.38
m to represent
the continuum underlying the PAH feature emission at 3.28
m. As
stated in Sect. 3, the emission at 3.38
m is
contaminated by a weaker PAH feature at
3.4
m (Sturm et al. 2000, and references therein),
resulting in an overestimate of the continuum. Nevertheless if one
uses their tabulated 3.18
m measurement as the continuum the
feature-to-continuum ratio for their Peak 1 (0.98) is still low relative
to that of their Peak 2 (2.13).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... emission
- Forbes
et al. (2000) suggest that the predicted value for radio continuum
flux is overestimated as a result of the presence of dense gas in
the region (Paglione et al. 1995).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.