**Table 7:** CM vs. CS: improvement of the metric values.
	d	d₂	d₅	d₆
% prop. ids.	52.2	57.3	79.0	97.0
% pub. ids.	69.6	62.2	85.0	97.1

NOTE: The first row shows the percentage of proposed identifications whose metric values have been improved in the CM test with respect to the CS one. The second row presents similar data for published identifications.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 The line of variations
	3 Application 1: Impact monitoring
	4 Application 2: Orbit determination
	5 Application 3: Orbit identification
	6 Application 4: Qualitative analysis
	7 Conclusions
	Appendix A: Comparison of LOV definitions
	References