\begin{table}%t5
%\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.05}
\caption{ A detailed analysis of the identifications
proposed by the CS and CM methods.}
\label{tab:ident_12constrained} 
%\centerline
\par
{
\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}
\hline
\hline
              & Only in  & Only in & In~~~~~     &         \\
PROP. IDS.    & CS~~     & CM~~    & CS and CM    & Total   \\  \hline
Total      & 817~~    & 8625~  & 2224~~~   & 11~666~ \\
Not in NS  & 760~~    & 8388~  & 1583~~~   & 10~721~ \\
1 C        & 527~~    & 3697~  &   916~~~   &  5140~ \\
2 C        &  96~~    &   512~  &   114~~~   &    722~ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
%\textsc{Note:}
NOTE:  This table emphasizes the role played by the
orbits obtained through constrained differential corrections: the
third and fourth rows show the number of identifications in which one
or both of the involved asteroids have an orbit computed by means of
that procedure.
\end{table}