![]() |
Figure 1:
Distribution of percentage of polarization p vs. intensity
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The geometry of the model. The H0=1.25 singular isothermal
toroid ( thick curves: isodensity contours; thin curves: magnetic
field lines) is observed from a line of sight (l.o.s.) inclined by an angle
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Maps of the dust emission and polarization at
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Same as Fig. 3 for the H0=0.5 singular isothermal toroid. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Same as Figs. 3 and 4 for the H0=1.25 singular isothermal toroid. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Polarization degree as function of intensity at 850 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Variation of maximum ( solid line) and minimum
( dotted line) polarization degree
as function of the isophotal aspect ratio r=b/a at
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Polarization degree as function of intensity at 850 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Polarization degree as function of intensity at 850 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |