Table 10: Comparison with MACHO photometry for the variable stars in common: Kovács subsample.
Id $_{\rm MACHO}$    Id $_{\rm this~paper}$ $\langle V_{\rm MACHO}\rangle $ $\langle V_{\rm this~paper}\rangle$ $\langle V_{\rm Kovacs}\rangle>$ $\langle V_{\rm this~paper}\rangle$ $\Delta 1$    $\Delta 2$    Field
    (mag-averaged) (mag-averaged) (int-averaged) (int-averaged)      

6.6931.603  

 2525     19.636 19.376 19.346 19.340 -0.260 -0.006 A
6.6932.948   4974     19.499 19.406 19.267 19.384 -0.093 0.117 A
6.6811.882   6398     19.526 19.347 19.263 19.317 -0.179 0.054 A
6.6811.736   6426     19.421 19.227 19.125 19.185 -0.194 0.060 A
6.6813.923   9494     19.483 19.266 19.140 19.217 -0.217 0.077 A
6.6934.1136   9660     19.615 19.407 19.400 19.392 -0.208 -0.008 A
6.6810.635   12 896     19.807 19.620 19.554 19.589 -0.187 0.035 A
6.6691.1079   25 301     20.006 19.805 19.719 19.766 -0.201 0.047 A
6.7054.801   25 362     19.656 19.488 19.399 19.443 -0.168 0.044 A
6.6692.1042   26 525     19.685 19.507 19.406 19.473 -0.178 0.067 A
13.5956.410   1408     19.288 19.369 19.225 19.343 0.081 0.118 B
13.5835.395   1575     19.262 19.290 19.177 19.250 0.028 0.073 B
13.6078.524   3054     19.084 19.089 18.962 19.066 0.005 0.104 B
6.6931.817   3061     19.983 19.679 19.724 19.631 -0.304 -0.093 A
13.5957.489   3400     19.607 19.530 19.443 19.469 -0.077 0.026 B
13.6199.527   3412     19.596 19.460 19.403 19.425 -0.136 0.022 B
6.7053.758   3805     19.567 19.415 19.387 19.402 -0.152 0.015 A
6.6811.752   3948     19.497 19.331 19.283 19.292 -0.166 0.009 A
13.5837.629   4540     19.443 19.450 19.358 19.414 0.007 0.056 B
13.5837.382   4859     19.278 19.294 19.152 19.240 0.016 0.088 B
6.6811.591   4933     19.387 19.127 19.141 19.103 -0.260 -0.038 A
13.5837.566   5902     19.169 19.165 19.047 19.121 -0.004 0.074 B
13.6079.125   5952     18.444 18.463 18.392 18.459 0.019 0.067 B
6.7054.713   6415     19.436 19.215 19.275 19.206 -0.221 -0.069 A
13.5838.576   6440     19.133 19.280 19.038 19.247 0.147 0.213 B
13.6201.449   7063     19.195 19.213 19.147 19.195 0.018 0.048 B
6.7054.582   7477     19.408 19.249 19.148 19.183 -0.159 0.035 A
6.7054.373   7609     19.617 19.340 19.299 19.313 -0.277 0.014 A
13.6080.435   7620     19.108 19.133 19.014 19.079 0.025 0.065 B
6.6933.1036   8788     19.706 19.482 19.413 19.444 -0.224 0.031 A
6.6933.953   9154     19.780 19.569 19.534 19.522 -0.211 -0.012 A
6.6813.1071   10 487     19.838 19.603 19.581 19.569 -0.235 -0.012 A
13.6078.615   10 692     19.568 19.574 19.463 19.548 0.006 0.085 B
13.6078.672   10 811     19.538 19.492 19.363 19.431 -0.046 0.068 B
6.6931.779   10 914     19.853 19.784 19.704 19.767 -0.069 0.063 A
13.5957.581   14 449     19.459 19.450 19.385 19.514 -0.009 0.129 B
6.6690.904   15 387     19.814 19.630 19.533 19.612 -0.184 0.079 A
6.6811.969   16 249     19.674 19.430 19.372 19.379 -0.244 0.007 A
13.6080.645   22 917     19.439 19.462 19.321 19.427 0.023 0.106 B
13.6080.584   24 089     19.450 19.370 19.324 19.365 -0.080 0.041 B
6.7055.830   26 933     19.597 19.355 19.303 19.295 -0.242 -0.008 A
6.7055.1045 28 539     19.945 19.592 19.631 19.533 -0.353 -0.098 A


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Article Contents
1 Introduction
2 Observations and reductions
3 Identification of the variable stars
4 A star by star comparison with MACHO and OGLE II photometries
5 The pulsation characteristics of the RR Lyrae stars
6 Fourier decomposition of the light curves
Appendix A: Atlas of the light curves
References
Online Material
List of tables
List of figures