Table 10: Same as Table 9 but using the new classification method, based on the stellar population synthesis results.
Cluster EL K+A N

All 8 (35%) 3 (13%) 12 (52%)

Centre 0 0 5 (100%)

Intermediate 1 (14%) 2 (29%) 4 (57%)

Periphery 7 (64%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%)

Field 16 (52%) 3 (10%) 12 (38%)

**Table 10:** Same as Table 9 but using the new classification method, based on the stellar population synthesis results.
Cluster	EL	K+A	N
All	8 (35%)	3 (13%)	12 (52%)
Centre	0	0	5 (100%)
Intermediate	1 (14%)	2 (29%)	4 (57%)
Periphery	7 (64%)	1 (9%)	3 (27%)
Field	16 (52%)	3 (10%)	12 (38%)

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Observations and data reduction
	3 Redshift determination and galaxy catalogue
	4 Cluster members - definition of the sample and some structural and dynamical properties
	5 Stellar population synthesis
	6 Analysis on spectral and morphological classes
	7 Colours
	8 Summary
	References
	Online Material