All Tables

Table 1: Basic properties of And II taken from: 1 - Schlegel et al. (1998); 2 - van den Bergh (2000); 3 - Amandroff & da Costa (1999); 4 - Mateo (1998); 5 - Côté et al. (1999b).
Table 2: Observing log.
Table 3: Star counts and properties for sample 2 and the mean properties of the C-star candidates identified in Fig. 3.
Table A.1: Typical example (all C-stars) for the And II results, extracted from the full table (with 2307 entries), which is available via CDS. Column 1 gives an ID code, Col. 2 the aprox. 4-digit xy-coordinates on CCD) for every star, while Cols. 3 and 4 list the coordinates (J2000.0) in the form hhmmss.sss and ddmmss.ss, respectively. A special flag F is given in Col. 4, which denotes in which region of Fig. 3 the star falls ( c for carbon stars, o for oxygen-rich stars, r for the rest), if it is member of sample 2. If the flag F is u (for unclassified), the star is from sample 1 and not included in the smaller sample 2, which means it has only Vi-photometry. Columns 5-7 list the photometric results, i, V-i, TiO-CN. The astrometric data may be afflicted with a systematic error of 0.5-1.2 $\hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ introduced by the accuracy limits of the GSC reference stars (Taff et al. 1990), the mean uncertainty of the MIDAS astrometric solution is 0.05 $\hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ rms (with a maximum of 0.11 $\hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ ).