![]() |
Figure 1: Transmission curves of the Spitzer and ISO filters used to survey the Lockman Hole on the M 82 SED (dotted lines) put at the redshift of z=0., 0.5, 1, and 1.5. The LW3 data remain unique also after the Spitzer observations since the most important PAH features pass through the LW3 filter in the redshift range z=0-1.5. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Four examples of reduction of part of one pixel data with the Lari et al. (2001, on the left) and the PRETI ( on the right) methods. Vertical lines separate the readouts for each pointing of the camera. Raw data, model, and reconstructed signal are marked with thin, thick and dotted lines, respectively. In these four cases the PRETI method fails to detect the sources close to glitches or in negative parts of the signal. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The ratio between measured and predicted fluxes for 21 stars detected
at 14.3 ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Number of glitches per frame versus exposure time per sky pixel for the ISOCAM deep surveys (LHD and LHS, Lockman Hole Deep and Shallow, HDFN and HDFS, Hubble Deep Field North and South, MD, Marano Deep, UD1 and UD2, Ultra-deep fields in the Marano field). The number of glitches in the signal due to cosmic ray hits are computed for glitches which are 5 times bigger than the rms of the signal for each pixel. The surveys with the longest scans (LHS and MD) have the lowest number of glitches. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Fraction of simulated sources detected as a function of the input flux.
Bars correspond to the 1-![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Astrometric accuracy versus SNR for
simulated sources (empty circles) and real sources (filled triangles)
compared to their optical counterparts. The points correspond to
1![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Difference in position between the infrared sources and
their optical counterparts. The diameter of the external circle
corresponds to the LW3 beam (4.7
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: Distribution of fluxes of detected sources with respect to the input flux of the simulated sources. Gaussian curves have parameters computed by means of a biweight estimator. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Comparison of flux estimates for sources detected in both the shallow
and deep Lockman Hole surveys. The caustics represent the 1![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12: Comparison between sources detected in the central region of the field by the shallow and deep surveys. Top panel: black dots are sources detected in the two surveys while empty triangles only in the shallow one. Bottom panel: total number of sources in the shallow survey (solid line) and shallow detection not present in the deep survey (shaded histogram). Sources brighter than 0.45 mJy have a high degree of reliability. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Four optical counterparts of 14.3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14: Cumulative counts for sources, galaxies, stars and blank fields are marked with dashed, solid, dotted and dash-dotted lines, respectively. For fluxes greater than 0.6 mJy (50% completeness limit), 21% of the sources are stars and less than 2% are blank fields in our r' image. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Coverage map of the Lockman Hole shallow survey. Dark regions correspond
to the overlapping of raster scans (![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: SNR image of the total field observed by ISOCAM in the direction of the Lockman Hole. The 21 stars used to check the calibration flux factor are marked with circles. |
Open with DEXTER |