All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f1.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Steady state analytic relations between the velocities of neutrals and charges are compared to an overlaid steady C-shock (diamonds). The parameters of the shock are u=20 km s^-1, n=10⁴ cm^-3 and b=0.1, time is t=10⁵ yr. The velocities in the shock frame are computed using a velocity of the shock front of 0.13 km s^-1, inferred from Fig. 3d of Paper I.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f2.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: Steady state analytic relations between pressure and mass density are compared to an overlaid future C-shock (diamonds). The parameters of the shock are u=20 km s^-1, n=10⁴ cm^-3 and b=0.1, time is t=10² yr. The additional necessary parameters $B_{\rm p}$ and $\dot{E}_{\rm p}$ are read in the shock model at the end of the precursor (they are not fitted).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.6cm,clip]{0873f3.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: We plot the $\chi ^2$ values and steady velocities for each variables of S in each zone of snapshot t=200 years for the shock with parameters b=0, n=10⁴ cm^-3, and u=20 km s^-1. Each dot represents the steady velocity of one variable computed thanks to expressions (44) and (45). The error bars are $v\pm \sigma$ evaluated zone per zone on these values. We indicate the computational domains associated to the adiabatic front and the relaxation layer of the shock.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.1cm,clip]{0873f4.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: Trajectory and velocity away from the piston of the J-shock with parameters b=0, n=10⁴ cm^-3, and u=20 km s^-1 (from Paper I). Overlaid diamonds are the steady velocities v averaged over all variables and all zones, for each snapshot analysed.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.4cm,clip]{0873f5.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: Same as Fig. 3, but for a partly ionising shock of parameters b=0, n=10⁴ cm^-3, and u=40 km s^-1 at time t=220 years. Here, the scale of the plot is linear, so that the dispersion is in fact much greater than for the non-dissociative shocks, even in the second plateau.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.4cm,clip]{0873f6.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 6: Same as Fig. 3, but for time t=100 years of the future C-shock with b=0.1, n=10⁴ cm^-3, and u=20 km s^-1. We also show the steady velocity for the magnetic field.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.3cm,clip]{0873f7.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 7: Same as Fig. 4, but for a C-shock of parameters b=0.1, n=10⁴ cm^-3 and u=20 km s^-1. Curves plot the trajectory and velocity of the neutral (solid) and charged (dashed) viscous fronts. Diamonds are the quasi-steady velocities of the relaxation layer and adiabatic front. Triangles are the quasi-steady velocities of the magnetic precursor.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f8.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 8: Schematical view of a J-type shock in the piston frame and in the shock frame.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f9.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 9: Schematical view of an early magnetised shock in the piston frame.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f1.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Steady state analytic relations between the velocities of neutrals and charges are compared to an overlaid steady C-shock (diamonds). The parameters of the shock are u=20 km s^-1, n=10⁴ cm^-3 and b=0.1, time is t=10⁵ yr. The velocities in the shock frame are computed using a velocity of the shock front of 0.13 km s^-1, inferred from Fig. 3d of Paper I.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f2.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: Steady state analytic relations between pressure and mass density are compared to an overlaid future C-shock (diamonds). The parameters of the shock are u=20 km s^-1, n=10⁴ cm^-3 and b=0.1, time is t=10² yr. The additional necessary parameters $B_{\rm p}$ and $\dot{E}_{\rm p}$ are read in the shock model at the end of the precursor (they are not fitted).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.1cm,clip]{0873f4.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 4: Trajectory and velocity away from the piston of the J-shock with parameters b=0, n=10⁴ cm^-3, and u=20 km s^-1 (from Paper I). Overlaid diamonds are the steady velocities v averaged over all variables and all zones, for each snapshot analysed.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.4cm,clip]{0873f5.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 5: Same as Fig. 3, but for a partly ionising shock of parameters b=0, n=10⁴ cm^-3, and u=40 km s^-1 at time t=220 years. Here, the scale of the plot is linear, so that the dispersion is in fact much greater than for the non-dissociative shocks, even in the second plateau.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.4cm,clip]{0873f6.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 6: Same as Fig. 3, but for time t=100 years of the future C-shock with b=0.1, n=10⁴ cm^-3, and u=20 km s^-1. We also show the steady velocity for the magnetic field.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.3cm,clip]{0873f7.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 7: Same as Fig. 4, but for a C-shock of parameters b=0.1, n=10⁴ cm^-3 and u=20 km s^-1. Curves plot the trajectory and velocity of the neutral (solid) and charged (dashed) viscous fronts. Diamonds are the quasi-steady velocities of the relaxation layer and adiabatic front. Triangles are the quasi-steady velocities of the magnetic precursor.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f8.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 8: Schematical view of a J-type shock in the piston frame and in the shock frame.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{0873f9.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 9: Schematical view of an early magnetised shock in the piston frame.
Open with DEXTER