All Tables
- Table 1:
Narrow band filter characteristics and interferometric coupler splitting ratios as measured in laboratory calibrations.
- Table 2:
Reference sources.
- Table 4:
Photometric data.
- Table 5:
Model fit of the 1997 K band data and 2000 L' band data of R Leo and comparison with the results obtained by Mennesson et al. (2002).
- Table 6:
Model fit of the 2001 K band data and 2000 L' band data of R Leo.
- Table 7:
Model fit parameters of the October 2000 narrow band data and November 2000 L' band data and of the November 2001 narrow band data of Mira.
- Table 8:
Model fit parameters of the May 2002 narrow band data of T Cep.
- Table 9:
Model fit parameters of the October 2000 narrow band and November 2000 L' band data and of the November 2001 data of U Ori. It was not possible to estimate useful error bars for several of the parameters with the 2000 dataset.
- Table 10:
Model fit parameters of the November 2001 and May 2002 narrow band data of
Cyg.
- Table 11:
Model fit parameters of the October 2000 wide K' band data of R Tri with FLUOR and PTI.
- Table 12:
Comparison of model
with the excitation temperature of the "cool'' CO component observed spectroscopically at a similar phase by Hinkle et al. (1984, 1997). Typical error estimates are 100 K for T* and 200 K for excitation temperature
.
- Table 13:
Comparison between the radius of the layer reported in this paper and the average radius of the SiO maser ring of Cotton et al. (2004) for R Leo, Mira and U Ori.
- Table 14:
Linear radii derived from angular radii determined in this study. Parallaxes are from Hipparcos except for U Ori which was derived from a period-luminosity relation (Whitelock et al. (2000b)).
is the pseudo-effective temperature defined in this paper and determined from the observed luminosity
and our diameter measurements R*.
- Table 3:
Log of observations.