All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{fig1.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Total energy evolution for the two-dimensional centrally ignited explosion model ( solid line), for the three-dimensional low-resolution centrally ignited ( dashed line) explosion model, for the three-dimensional low-resolution 5 bubbles ( dotted-dotted-dashed line), and for the three dimensional high-resolution 30 bubbles ( dotted-dashed line) explosion model.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig2a.eps} \includegra... ...m,clip]{fig2c.eps} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig2d.eps} } \end{figure}$ Figure 2: Snapshots of the front evolution for the centrally ignited model c3_3d_256 at 0 s, 0.2 s, 0.4 s, and 0.6 s.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig3a.eps} \includegra... ...m,clip]{fig3c.eps} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig3d.eps} } \end{figure}$ Figure 3: Snapshots of the front evolution for the floating-bubble model b30_3d_768 at 0 s, 0.1 s, 0.14 s, and 0.2 s.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{fig4.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: Radial distribution of the tracer particles in the 3D model at the beginning of the simulation.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.9cm,clip]{fig5.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: Temperature ( upper panel) and density ( lower panel) history in the tracer particles for the b30_3d_768 model. The thick lines represent the upper envelope of the distribution and the thin dashed lines represent some of the markers randomly taken as examples.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm]{fig6.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 6: Example of the nucleosynthesis calculation in one tracer particle. T and $\rho$ are plotted in the upper left panel; with $T > 6\times 10^{9}$ K reaches NSE conditions. In the upper right panel the resulting $Y_{\rm e}$ is shown. The other panels give the mass fraction vs. time for ¹⁶O, ²⁸Si, ³²S, ^54,56Fe, ^56,57,58Ni, ⁶³Cu, and ⁶⁴Zn. For ¹⁶O, ²⁸Si, ³²S the time is plotted only up to 0.2 s since their abundances are zero at later times.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{fig7.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 7: The same as Fig. 5 for the history of the $Y_{\rm e}$ in the markers.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{fig8.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 8: Distribution of the tracer particles vs. radius at $\sim$ 1.2 s. for b30_3d_768 ( upper panel), c3_3d_256 ( middle panel), and b5_3d_256 ( lower panel) models. The unburned particles ( $T < 1.5 \times 10^9$ K) are plotted with a solid line, and the processed particles with a dashed line.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=12.6cm,clip]{fig9.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 9: Nucleosynthetic yields (in mass fraction normalized to the solar value and to the corresponding solar ratio) obtained using 19 683 tracer particles in the 3D model b30_3d_768 compared to the W7 yields given by Thielemann et al. (2003).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.1cm,clip]{fig10.eps}\vspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.1cm,clip]{fig11.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 10: Nucleosynthetic yield ratio, comparing the model c3_2d_512 ( dotted line), and c3_3d_256 ( solid line), with our standard model b30_3d_768 ( upper panel). Nucleosynthetic yield ratio, comparing the model b5_3d_256 with our standard model b30_3d_768 ( lower panel).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11.4cm,clip]{fig12.eps}\vspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11.4cm,clip]{fig13.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 11: Mass fractions of selected isotopes as a function of the radial velocity of the markers (taken at $\sim$ 1.2 s) for the b30_3d_768 model ( upper panel) and for the c3_3d_256 ( lower panel). The width of each velocity bin is 300 km s^-1. For each isotope we sum its abundance over all markers in a certain velocity bin.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{fig1.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Total energy evolution for the two-dimensional centrally ignited explosion model ( solid line), for the three-dimensional low-resolution centrally ignited ( dashed line) explosion model, for the three-dimensional low-resolution 5 bubbles ( dotted-dotted-dashed line), and for the three dimensional high-resolution 30 bubbles ( dotted-dashed line) explosion model.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig2a.eps} \includegra... ...m,clip]{fig2c.eps} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig2d.eps} } \end{figure}$	Figure 2: Snapshots of the front evolution for the centrally ignited model c3_3d_256 at 0 s, 0.2 s, 0.4 s, and 0.6 s.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig3a.eps} \includegra... ...m,clip]{fig3c.eps} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{fig3d.eps} } \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Snapshots of the front evolution for the floating-bubble model b30_3d_768 at 0 s, 0.1 s, 0.14 s, and 0.2 s.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{fig4.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 4: Radial distribution of the tracer particles in the 3D model at the beginning of the simulation.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.9cm,clip]{fig5.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 5: Temperature ( upper panel) and density ( lower panel) history in the tracer particles for the b30_3d_768 model. The thick lines represent the upper envelope of the distribution and the thin dashed lines represent some of the markers randomly taken as examples.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip]{fig7.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 7: The same as Fig. 5 for the history of the $Y_{\rm e}$ in the markers.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{fig8.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 8: Distribution of the tracer particles vs. radius at $\sim$ 1.2 s. for b30_3d_768 ( upper panel), c3_3d_256 ( middle panel), and b5_3d_256 ( lower panel) models. The unburned particles ( $T < 1.5 \times 10^9$ K) are plotted with a solid line, and the processed particles with a dashed line.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=12.6cm,clip]{fig9.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 9: Nucleosynthetic yields (in mass fraction normalized to the solar value and to the corresponding solar ratio) obtained using 19 683 tracer particles in the 3D model b30_3d_768 compared to the W7 yields given by Thielemann et al. (2003).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.1cm,clip]{fig10.eps}\vspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=8.1cm,clip]{fig11.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 10: Nucleosynthetic yield ratio, comparing the model c3_2d_512 ( dotted line), and c3_3d_256 ( solid line), with our standard model b30_3d_768 ( upper panel). Nucleosynthetic yield ratio, comparing the model b5_3d_256 with our standard model b30_3d_768 ( lower panel).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11.4cm,clip]{fig12.eps}\vspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11.4cm,clip]{fig13.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 11: Mass fractions of selected isotopes as a function of the radial velocity of the markers (taken at $\sim$ 1.2 s) for the b30_3d_768 model ( upper panel) and for the c3_3d_256 ( lower panel). The width of each velocity bin is 300 km s^-1. For each isotope we sum its abundance over all markers in a certain velocity bin.
Open with DEXTER