![]() |
Figure 1:
Large-scale kinematics of the eastern tidal tail of IC 1182. Top: optical R-band map (Iglesias-Páramo et al.
2003) and HI contours (Dickey 1997). The TDG candidate ce-61 is identified. The dashed lines delineate the band along
which the PV diagram has been derived; north is to the top. Bottom: PV diagram of the tidal tail (
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Small-scale kinematics of a TDG candidate in the northern part of NGC 5291. Top: optical V-band map (Duc & Mirabel 1998) and HI contours (Malphrus et al. 1997); north is to the left. The dashed line indicates the slit used for the PV diagram. Bottom: PV diagram of the TDG candidate (3 kpc = 10''), showing an inner velocity gradient as large as 100 km s-1 over 2.4 kpc. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Example of a restricted three-body simulation of two interacting galaxies, with a mass ratio of 1:1 (impact parameter 100 kpc, relative velocity 150 km s-1, inclination 30 degrees). In the plot of the projected mass distribution ( bottom), the tidal tail is seen rather close to edge-on (inlination of 65 degrees) whereas the simulated PV diagram ( top) corresponds to the tail which would be observed exactly edge-on. A projection effect exists when part of the tail is aligned with the line-of-sight (encircled region). The velocity gradient is first positive from the parent galaxy to the outer parts, and then becomes negative before the region affected by the projection problem. This early change in the sign of the velocity gradient is the clear signature of a projection effect at the apparent tip of the tail. Further away, the observed (projected) velocity keeps on decreasing, drawing a loop in the PV diagram. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Example of a full N-body simulation of two interacting galaxies, with a mass ratio of 1:1 (impact parameter 100 kpc, relative velocity 200 km s-1, inclination 0 degrees). In the plot of the mass distribution ( bottom), the tidal tail is seen face-on whereas the simulated PV diagram ( top) corresponds to the tail which would be observed exactly edge-on. A part of the tail is aligned with the line-of-sight (indicated with the arrow), so that a projection effect exists. In the configuration of this run, the velocity gradient is first positive and then becomes negative before the extremity of the tail. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: PV diagrams expected for tidal tails that are seen edge-on, according to the results of our numerical simulations. Case a): no part of the tail is aligned with the line-of-sight and an observed mass concentration cannot result from a projection effect. The sign of the projected velocity gradient does not change. Case b): a projection effect exists and could be responsible for the observation of a mass concentration. The sign of the velocity gradient changes before the apparent extremity of the tail. A loop-shaped diagram is obtained when the tidal tails extends much further than the projection effect (dashed lines). The whole loop may however be difficult to detect since the most external parts of tidal tails are likely to be faint. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: PV diagram of the northern tidal tail of Arp 105, from HI data of Duc et al. (1997) (20 kpc = 33''). We find here the kinematical signature expected for a tidal tail with a projection effect (case b) in Fig. 5). The band along which the PV diagram has been integrated is shown in the optical map. The crosses on the diagram and the optical map identify the position of the center of the parent spiral galaxy. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Kinematics of the southern tail of Arp 105 (NGC 3561, The Guitar). Center: optical V-band map (Duc & Mirabel 1994) and HI contours (Duc et al. 1997). North is to the right. The TDG candidate is the most luminous feature on the left of the elliptical galaxy.
Top: H![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Kinematics of the northern tail of Arp 242. Top: DSS blue image and HI contours (Hibbard & van Gorkom 1996). North is to the left; the arrow identifies the TDG candidate. Bottom: H![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Isovelocities diagram of NGC 5291 northern TDG (1 kpc = 3''). The classical spider shape, corresponding to the rotation of the system, can be identified, but is largely disturbed which probes that supplementary motions or distortions play a role. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Projected velocity of the northern TDG of NGC 5291, as a function of the position along the axis shown in Fig. 9 (1 kpc = 3''). The center of rotation is here defined as the mass center of the H![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.1:
Top: H![]() |
![]() |
Figure A.2:
Top: H![]() |
![]() |
Figure A.3:
H![]() |
![]() |
Figure A.4:
Left: H![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Figure A.5:
Top: H![]() |
![]() |
Figure A.6:
Top: H![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Figure A.9:
H![]() |
![]() |
Figure A.10:
H![]() ![]() |