Table 1: Best-fit parameters derived from RT-modelling of NGC 4013, NGC 5907 and NGC 4565 in the V-band. $\tau _{V}^{f}$ is the visual optical depth when the galaxy is viewed face-on and $\theta$ is the inferred inclination of the object. $h_{\rm d}$ and $z_{\rm d}$ are, respectively, the exponential scalelength and exponential scaleheight of the dust assuming the distance listed in the second column. Distances to NGC 4013, NGC 4565 and NGC 5907 are taken, respectively, from Bottema (1995), Rupen (1991) and van der Kruit & Searle (1982).
Galaxy Distance $\tau _{V}^{f}$ $h_{\rm d}$ $z_{\rm d}$ $\theta$

(Mpc) (kpc) (kpc) (deg)

NGC 4013 12 0.67 2.45 0.13 89.7

NGC 4565 10 0.63 9.7 0.21 88.0

NGC 5907 11 0.49 5.29 0.11 87.2

**Table 1:** Best-fit parameters derived from RT-modelling of NGC 4013, NGC 5907 and NGC 4565 in the V-band. $\tau _{V}^{f}$ is the visual optical depth when the galaxy is viewed face-on and $\theta$ is the inferred inclination of the object. $h_{\rm d}$ and $z_{\rm d}$ are, respectively, the exponential scalelength and exponential scaleheight of the dust assuming the distance listed in the second column. Distances to NGC 4013, NGC 4565 and NGC 5907 are taken, respectively, from Bottema (1995), Rupen (1991) and van der Kruit & Searle (1982).
Galaxy	Distance	$\tau _{V}^{f}$	$h_{\rm d}$	$z_{\rm d}$	$\theta$
	(Mpc)		(kpc)	(kpc)	(deg)
NGC 4013	12	0.67	2.45	0.13	89.7
NGC 4565	10	0.63	9.7	0.21	88.0
NGC 5907	11	0.49	5.29	0.11	87.2

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text