\begin{table}%t5
%\centering
\par
\caption{Best-fit parameters of the constant + skewed Gaussian model 
reproducing the cross-correlation (CCF) peaks. We cross-correlated
the whole light curves of November~14, of December 1st
and their main flares. We compared the [0.2--0.8] keV light curves 
to the  [0.8--2.4]~keV (Id. I) and to the [2.4--10] keV light curves (Id. II).
We also performed a Discrete cross-correlation (DCC) on the same curves.
We reproduced the central $\pm$15~ks and $\pm$5~ks of the November 14 
CCF and the central $\pm$5~ks of those of December~1st.
Negative lags mean that the variations in the hard X-ray band lead those 
in the soft X-ray band. The reported skewed Gaussian~$\sigma_i$ 
 are the weighted averages of the four amplitudes.\label{tab5}}
\begin{tabular}{ccccc|cc}
\hline\hline
Curves id.& \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Lag (s)} & $\langle \sigma_1 \rangle$ & $\langle\sigma_2\rangle$ \\
\hline
bin-time (s)  & 50 & 100 & 200 & 500 &($10^3$ s) & ($10^3$ s)  \\ 
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{c}{14 Nov. 2002: whole curve. Central $\pm15$ ks.}\\
\hline
 CCF I  & $-890\pm40$ & $-750\pm60$ & $-830\pm70$ & $-760\pm120$ & $13.41\pm0.15$ & $12.76\pm0.17$  \\
 DCC I  & $-1030$ & $-830$  & $-740$ & $-930$ & $13.52$  & $12.72$  \\
 CCF II  & $-1860\pm60$ & $-1670\pm80$ & $-1730\pm110$ & $-1620\pm160$ & $15.04\pm0.15$ & $12.59\pm0.20$ \\
 DCC II  & $-2010$ & $-1760$ & $-1730$ & $-1920$ & $15.23$ & $12.36$ \\
%
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{c}{14 Nov. 2002: whole curve. Central $\pm5$ ks.}\\
\hline
 CCF I  & $-140\pm90$ & $-60\pm110$ & $-50\pm180$ & $-20\pm250$ & $4.00\pm0.17$ & $2.81\pm0.20$  \\
 DCC I  & $-90$ & $-80$  & $-20$ & $-50$ & $4.04$  & $2.66$  \\
 CCF II   & $-180\pm130$ & $-180\pm180$ & $-120\pm260$  & $-90\pm360$ & $7.20\pm0.40$ & $3.02\pm0.27$ \\
 DCC II  & $-80$ & $-170$ & $-60$ & $-60$ & $7.40$ & $2.79$ \\
%
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{c}{14 Nov. 2002: main flare. Central $\pm15$ ks.}\\
\hline
 CCF I & $-600\pm40$ & $-560\pm60$ & $-630\pm90$ & $-640\pm140$ & $9.04\pm0.06$ & $7.84\pm0.07$ \\
 DCC I  & $-770$ & $-700$ & $-620$ & $-790$ & $9.10$  & $8.01$ \\
 CCF II  & $-1390\pm60$ & $-1350\pm90$ & $-1340\pm130$ & $-1410\pm190$ & $10.46\pm0.07$ &  $8.24\pm0.09$ \\
 DCC II  & $-1580$ & $-1550$ & $-1460$ & $-1370$ & $10.39$ & $8.38$ \\
%
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{c}{14 Nov. 2002: main flare. Central $\pm5$ ks}\\
\hline
 CCF I  & $-210\pm90$ & $-140\pm140$ & $-110\pm190$ & $-80\pm300$ & $3.97\pm0.18$ & $2.95\pm0.21$ \\
 DCC I  & $-220$ & $-160$ & $-90$ & $-150$ & $4.30$   & $3.14$ \\
 CCF II  & $-410\pm170$ & $-290\pm260$ & $-250\pm340$ & $-220\pm500$ & $8.31\pm0.56$ &  $4.01\pm0.43$ \\
 DCC II  & $-340$ & $-380$ & $-240$ & $-350$ & $8.58$ & $4.30$ \\
%
\hline
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{c}{1 Dec. 2002: whole curve}\\
\hline 
CCF I  & $160\pm50$ & $220\pm60$ & $250\pm90$ & $230\pm120$ & $2.41\pm0.07$ & $4.04\pm0.06$ \\
DCC I &   $90$  & $160$ & $200$ & $120$ & $2.49$ & $4.03$ \\
CCF II  & $530\pm80$ & $570\pm100$ & $610\pm130$ & $740\pm220$ & $2.87\pm0.13$ & $6.04\pm0.18$\\
DCC II  &  $560$  & $570$ & $590$ & $400$ & $2.77$ & $6.08$\\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{c}{1 Dec. 2002: flare}\\
\hline
CCF I  & $430\pm50$ & $470\pm60$ & $490\pm80$ & $480\pm110$ & $3.29\pm0.10$ & $3.85\pm0.08$ \\
 DCC I  & $400$ & $460$ & $480$ & $450$ & $3.24$ & $3.83$ \\ 
CCF II  & $950\pm80$ & $950\pm100$ & $940\pm130$ & $860\pm180$ & $3.39\pm0.15$ & $4.34\pm0.10$\\
 DCC II  & $1040$ & $960$ & $920$ & $840$ &  $3.32$ & $4.29$\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}