![]() |
Figure 1: Fractional abundance of selected species over time; T=10 K, n(H2)=104 cm-3. The filled symbols are the RATE99 model, the hollow symbols are the NSM model. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Fractionation of selected species vs. time from the accretion models; T=10 K, n(H2)=106 cm-3. Left: RATE99 model; right: NSM model. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Fractional abundance of selected species vs. time from the accretion models; T=10 K, n(H2)=106 cm-3. Left: RATE99 model; right: NSM model. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Model predictions for D2CO fractionation as a function of CO depletion at 10 K, from the RATE99 model at various densities, compared with the observations of Bacmann et al. (2002, 2003) towards prestellar cores. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Model predictions for the rise in D2CO fractionation at 10 K (right-hand axis) as CO freezes out (left-hand axis). The solid lines are for n(H2)=106 cm-3; the dashed lines are for n(H2)=105 cm-3. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Physical parameters of prestellar cores as a function of radius. Top: L1544 (Tafalla et al. 2002); bottom: Oph D (Motte et al. 1998; Bergin et al. 2002). The dark lines represent the best fit to the observations, while the lighter `stairs' show the model fits we have adopted. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Fractional abundances vs. radius for selected molecules in L1544, using the density and temperature profiles from Fig. 6. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Molecular D/H ratios vs. radius for selected molecules in L1544, using the density and temperature profiles from Fig. 6. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Fractional abundances ( top) and molecular D/H ratios ( bottom) vs. radius for selected molecules in Oph D, using the density and temperature profiles from Fig. 6. |
Open with DEXTER |