Table 4: Comparison of the average NIR host galaxy propertiesa.
Sample Filter N $\langle z \rangle$ $\langle M_H({\rm nuc}) \rangle$ $\langle M_H({\rm host}) \rangle$ $\langle R({\rm e}) \rangle$
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
BL (this work) H 23 0.155 $\pm$ 0.091 -24.5 $\pm$ 1.6 -25.8 $\pm$ 0.7 7.8 $\pm$ 4.1
BL C03 K 8 0.186 $\pm$ 0.088 -25.6 $\pm$ 0.8 -26.0 $\pm$ 0.4 4.2 $\pm$ 2.3
BL S00 H 9 0.206 $\pm$ 0.074 -25.0 $\pm$ 1.6 -26.2 $\pm$ 0.4 10 $\pm$ 5
BL K98 H 7 0.112 $\pm$ 0.068 -25.7 $\pm$ 1.7 -25.8 $\pm$ 0.5 4.8 $\pm$ 1.9
BL all H/K 42 0.164 $\pm$ 0.084 -25.0 $\pm$ 1.5 -25.9 $\pm$ 0.6 7.2 $\pm$ 3.6
L* Mobasher et al. (1993) K 136 0.077 $\pm$ 0.030   -25.0 $\pm$ 0.2  
BCM Thuan & Puschell (1989) H 84 0.074 $\pm$ 0.026   -26.3 $\pm$ 0.3  
BCM Aragon-Salamanca et al. (1998) K 25 0.449 $\pm$ 0.266   -27.0 $\pm$ 0.3  
RG FR II Taylor et al. (1996) K 12 0.214 $\pm$ 0.049 -25.1 $\pm$ 0.7 -26.1 $\pm$ 0.8 26 $\pm$ 16
RG Willott et al. (2003) z < 0.3 K 42 0.170 $\pm$ 0.075   -26.2 $\pm$ 0.5  
a Column (1) gives the sample; Col. 2: the filter; Col. 3: the number of objects in the sample; Col. 4: the average redshift of the sample; Cols. 5 and 6: the average H band nuclear and host galaxy absolute magnitude of the sample; and Col. 7: the average H-band bulge scale length of the sample.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text