![]() |
Figure 5: Results of the time series analysis for 6 regular variables in our sample. This figure provides information only on the variability periods in optical and SiO (both peak and integrated area in v=1 and v=2). The complete information obtained from this analysis for all suitable objects, including delays between SiO and optical or NIR maxima is provided in Table 2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: SiO versus NIR and Optical phase lag histograms for a sample that consists on the four SiO delays listed in Cols. 4 and 7 of Table 2 for those objects where suitable optical (from the AAVSO) and/or NIR (from LeB93) data exist. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Comparison of optical, SiO, and NIR (Smith et al. 2002, 2003) light curves in a subset of objects from our sample. The cases of o Cet, R Aqr and R Cas are of particular interest (see text). Dates of optical maxima are indicated by vertical lines unless otherwise indicated. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Left: optical and 28SiO v=1,2 J=1-0 light curves of o Cet (Mira) between mid 1984 and mid 1995. The v=2 curves have been shifted by 600 Jy (peak) and 2000 Jy km s-1 (area) for clarity. Right: time evolution of the monitored SiO lines as a function of LSR velocity. The contours mark the following flux levels (in Jy): 20, 40, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 1000, and 2000 for both v=1 and v=2. Dates of optical maxima are indicated by vertical lines. The solid horizontal line in the right panels represents the velocity of the CO J=2-1 peak emission, the dashed horizontal lines are the velocities at which the CO emission is half of the peak, and the dotted horizontal lines represent the terminal velocities at which CO emission disappears (from Cernicharo et al. 1997). The small vertical ticks mark the dates of observations. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Same as Fig. 8 but for GY Aql. The CO velocities are not shown in this case. The v=2 curves on the left panel have been shifted by 50 Jy (peak) and 200 Jy km s-1 (area) for clarity. The contour levels for SiO are: 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 160, 200, and 250 Jy for both v=1 and v=2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Left: near-Infrared (3.79 ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: SiO data of the young stellar object Orion Irc2. For clarity, we have introduced shifts in the lower left pannels for v=2 data with respect to v=1 data: 200 Jy (peak) and 500 Jy km s-1 (area). The contours correspond to the following levels (in Jy): and 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 700, 1000, 1500, and 2000 for both v=1 and v=2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
This figure and the following two display
the optical and SiO data of the three objects of
our sample classified as supergiant stars (VY CMa, VX Sgr and ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Analogous curves to those displayed in Fig. 2 but for VX Sgr. The shifts introduced in the lower left panels are the following: 300 Jy (peak) and 3000 Jy km s-1 (area). The contours correspond to the following levels (in Jy): 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, and 500 for v=1, and 15, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 for v=2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Analogous curves to those displayed
in Fig. 2 but for ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Left: near-Infrared (3.79 ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Left: near-Infrared (3.79 ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13: Same as Fig. 9 but for OH26.5+0.6. The contour levels for SiO are: 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 Jy for both v=1 and v=2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14: Same as Fig. 9 but for R Leo. The contour levels for SiO are: 20, 40, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 1000, and 1400 Jy for both v=1 and v=2. For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted by 500 Jy (peak) and 2000 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15: Same as Fig. 9 but for R Cas. The contour levels for SiO are: 20, 40, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 for both v=1 and v=2. For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted by 500 Jy (peak) and 2000 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16: Same as Fig. 9 but for R LMi. The contour levels for SiO are: 10, 20, 40, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300 and 400 Jy (v=1), and 10, 20, 30, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 and 300 (v=2). For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted by 400 Jy (peak) and 1000 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 17: Same as Fig. 9 but for R Aql. The contour levels for SiO are: 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 for both v=1 and v=2. For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted by 100 Jy (peak) and 300 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 18: Same as Fig. 9 but for W Hya. The contour levels for SiO are 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 3000 Jy for both v=1 and v=2. For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted with respect to v=1 by 1000 Jy and 5000 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 19: Same as Fig. 9 but for R Cnc. The contour levels for SiO are 10, 20, 40, 60, 75, 100, 150, 200, and 250 Jy in both v=1 and v=2. For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted with respect to v=1 by 100 Jy and 200 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 20: Same as Fig. 9 but for TX Cam. The contour levels for SiO are 10, 20, 40, 60, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 750 Jy in both v=1 and v=2. For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted with respect to v=1 by 500 Jy and 1000 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 21: Same as Fig. 9 but for U Her. The contour levels for SiO are 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 250, and 350 Jy in both v=1 and v=2. For clarity, the v=2 peak and area curves have been shifted with respect to v=1 by 200 Jy and 500 Jy km s-1 respectively. |
Open with DEXTER |