All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.6cm,clip]{0335fig1.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Left panels: gray-scale representation of the spectrograms for the relevant sections of the two observations analyzed here. Right panels: enlarged sections corresponding to the regions where the QPO signal is evident. The gray-scale bars on the right show the level of Leahy power. Notice that consecutive 4-s PDS in these images are shifted by only 1 s.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{0335fig2.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: PDS corresponding to the peak power in the spectrograms of Fig. 1 (empty bars) and average PDS of the preceding and following four PDS (filled bars).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.55cm,clip]{0335fig3.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: Folded light curves for the two intervals with the high-coherence oscillation. Two cycles are shown for clarity.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.6cm,clip]{0335fig1.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 1: Left panels: gray-scale representation of the spectrograms for the relevant sections of the two observations analyzed here. Right panels: enlarged sections corresponding to the regions where the QPO signal is evident. The gray-scale bars on the right show the level of Leahy power. Notice that consecutive 4-s PDS in these images are shifted by only 1 s.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{0335fig2.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: PDS corresponding to the peak power in the spectrograms of Fig. 1 (empty bars) and average PDS of the preceding and following four PDS (filled bars).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.55cm,clip]{0335fig3.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: Folded light curves for the two intervals with the high-coherence oscillation. Two cycles are shown for clarity.
Open with DEXTER