![]() |
Figure 1:
Comparison of derived [Na/Fe] for stars in
common with other studies. Filled circles (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Difference of [Na/Fe] abundance ratios calculated under NLTE and LTE assumptions as a function of metal abundance a), temperature b) and luminosity c). Filled circles refer to the thin-disk stars, open circles refer thick-disk stars. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Abundance ratios [Na/Fe] for NLTE analyses. The meaning of the symbols is the same as in Fig. 2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: [Na/Mg] abundances ratios for NLTE analysis as a function of [Mg/H]. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Top: abundance ratios [Na/Fe] for NLTE analysis as a function of [Fe/H]. Bottom: abundance ratios [Na/Mg] for NLTE analysis as a function of [Mg/H]. Filled and open circles refer to the thin- and thick-disk stars in this paper, respectively. Asterisks refer to the stars from Gehren et al. (2004). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: [Na/Fe] abundance ratios for NLTE analyses as a function of [Mg/Fe]. The meaning of symbols is the same as in Fig. 2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Correlation between Na abundance ratios and orbital V velocity components. Symbols are as in Fig. 2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Correlation between [Na/Fe] abundance ratios
and peculiar space velocities
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: [Na/Fe] ratios vs. stellar ages ( top), and [Na/Mg] abundance ratios vs. stellar ages ( bottom). Ages are in Gyr. Symbols have the same meaning as in Fig. 2. |
Open with DEXTER |