A&A 422, L33-L37 (2004)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040194
P. Møller 1 - J. P. U. Fynbo 2,3 - S. M. Fall 4
1 - European Southern Observatory,
Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2,
85748 Garching by München, Germany
2 -
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Århus,
Ny Munkegade, 8000 Århus C, Denmark
3 -
Astronomical Observatory, University of Copenhagen,
Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
4 -
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,
Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Received 20 February 2004 / Accepted 11 June 2004
Abstract
In an ongoing programme to identify a sample of high z DLA galaxies we
have found the long sought for case of a Ly
emitter seen in the
centre of a broad DLA trough. This is the predicted "textbook case''
of an intervening DLA galaxy if DLA galaxies are small, but would not
be expected if intervening high redshift DLA galaxies have large
gaseous disks. The Ly
flux is
similar to what has been found
in previously known high z DLA galaxies. The impact parameter
is found to be
.
This is smaller than what
was found in previous cases but still consistent with random sight-lines
through absorbers with mean impact parameter
1
.
Of the 24 DLAs targeted in the NICMOS imaging survey five have now
been identified as Ly
emitters.
The DLA galaxies with detected Ly
emission tend to have
higher interstellar metallicities than those with undetected
Ly
emission. This is plausibly explained as a consequence
of a positive correlation between the Ly
line luminosities
of the galaxies and their metallicities, although the present
sample is too small for a definitive conclusion. The available
observations of high-redshift DLA galaxies are also consistent
with a negative correlation between Ly
equivalent widths and
metallicities, as seen in nearby star-forming galaxies and
usually attributed to the preferential absorption of Ly
photons by dust grains.
Key words: galaxies: formation - galaxies: high-redshift - quasars: absorption lines - quasars: individual: PKS 0458-02
At redshifts
photometric redshifts are now known for 11 DLA
galaxies (Chen & Lanzetta 2003) but evolutionary models predict that
DLA galaxies at higher redshifts are of a different nature
(Lanfranchi & Friaca 2003).
In this paper we present the detection of Ly
emission from the
z=2.0395 DLA towards PKS 0458-02 at z=2.286.
This detection was obtained
in the course of a spectroscopic investigation of three candidate DLA
galaxy counterparts reported by Warren et al. (2001). The Ly
emission from the DLA towards PKS 0458-02 does not correspond to any
of the candidates at projected distances 0
86-4
17,
on the contrary it is
found almost exactly in the centre of the DLA absorption line, thereby
presenting itself nicely as a "textbook example'' of Ly
emission from a high-redshift DLA.
We did not detect emission lines in any of the three targeted candidates
(at impact parameters 0
86, 2
98, and 4
17) but at both
PAs we clearly detect an emission line in the centre of the DLA
absorption line, and at close to zero impact parameter (Fig. 1). Since
this object does not appear in any candidate list
we shall in what follows name it DLAg0458-02.
![]() |
Figure 1:
2D spectra of the DLA at z=2.0395. The top spectrum is
obtained with the slit at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Layout of the slits (full drawn lines) and determined
1 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
At PA = 55
0 and PA = 28
8 we find impact parameters of
and
respectively. In Fig. 2
we show the layout of the slit positions (solid lines) and the
1
ranges of the position of DLAg0458-02 inferred from the
two independent detections. In principle two different slit PAs is
enough to triangulate for the exact position of the DLA galaxy, but
unfortunately the two PAs are rather close to each other so there is
still uncertainty about the exact impact parameter.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Inner 2
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
In Fig. 3 we show an enlargement of the inner 2
by 2
where we
have calculated the combined 1
contour. The best fit position
of DLAg0458-02 is at
,
,
but the entire
PA range from 175
to 315
is allowed to within 1
.
The
full 1
range on
is from 0
0 to 0
6.
There is a hard upper limit of
as a larger
impact parameter would cause the object to fall outside the slit. We
conclude that
.
An impact parameter of
is too small for a detection in
the NICMOS survey of Warren et al. (2001).
![]() |
Figure 4:
FORS1/G600B spectrum of the z=2.0395 Damped Ly |
| Open with DEXTER | |
In Fig. 4 we show the 1D extraction of the spectrum (optimally weighted
sum of both PAs) and the Ly
emission line is clearly seen in
the centre of the Damped absorption line. We determine the centroid of
the emission line to be at 3696.86 Å corresponding to a redshift of
2.0410 which is 148 km s-1 higher than that of the DLA. However,
this is only correct if one assumes
.
For our best fit
value of
we must correct the redshift for the
offset of the object inside the slit and we then obtain a redshift of
2.0396 which is identical to that of the DLA. We shall adopt this latter
redshift as the best fit value. The emission line is unresolved at our
resolution and we find an upper limit of
Å corresponding to an upper limit of 400 km s-1 FWHM.
As seen in Fig. 4 the absorption profile is well fitted by a damped
Ly
line with an HI column density of
.
This is slightly larger
than, but consistent with, the values found by
Wolfe et al. (1993) (
)
and
Pettini et al. (1994) (
).
The flux of the Ly
emission line, as well as other relevant
measurements, are summarised in Table 1. The listed
on the
Ly
flux is mostly due to the uncertainty of the correction
for slit-losses (which are linked to the error on
),
the listed
is mostly due to the uncertainty of the flux
calibration. The Ly
flux of DLAg0458-02 is within the range found for Ly
selected galaxies at the same redshift (Fynbo et al. 2002).
The continuum of the DLA galaxy is for the most part hidden under the
QSO spectrum but a small fraction of it could be visible in the
DLA trough. To place a limit on the equivalent width of the emission
line we proceeded as follows. On the best fitting Ly
absorption
line profile (
)
we determined the
interval in which the calculated absorption line was completely black
(i.e. residual flux below 1/5 of the rms in the data). This is the
case over an interval of 38 Å. The central 15 Å are taken up by the emission line, the rest we summed up to
see if a galaxy continuum could be detected. We did not detect any
continuum, and we find a 2
lower limit on the observed
equivalent width of 47 Å or a rest equivalent width of
Å (
limit).
A long slit spectrum taken at
should be obtained in order to
verify the best fit impact parameter and PA found via triangulation.
This is needed to settle all open questions related to the exact
position of DLAg0458-02 inside the slit (redshift, velocity relative to
absorber, flux correction for slit loss).
Table 1: Data for PKS 0458-02 and DLAg0458-02.
Table 2:
Ly
emission
and metallicity data for five
DLA galaxies.
is the impact parameter,
is the HI column density, and
is the difference between DLA redshift and QSO redshift
given in km s-1. The "Type'' classifications in the last column
are defined as
"
'':
km s-1;
"sub-DLA'':
;
"DLA'': classic intervening non-sub DLAs.
![]() |
Figure 5:
Left: histogram of metallicities of the 17 DLAs of the
NICMOS sample for which metallicities are known (hashed red). Of the 17
only 4 have been detected as Ly |
| Open with DEXTER | |
Figure 5a is a histogram of the interstellar metallicities of the 17
DLA systems in the Warren et al. (2001) NICMOS sample for which the
metallicity is known. The subsample of four objects with detected
Ly
emission is indicated by solid blue bars, while the
subsample of 13 systems without detected Ly
emission is
indicated by red hatched bars. Evidently, there is a tendency for the
detected objects to have higher metallicities than the undetected
objects, although the sample is too small to draw a definitive
conclusion from this comparison. Four of the objects in the Warren
et al. sample might not be regarded as "bona fide'' DLAs in the sense
that they are close to the QSO (
km s-1) or that
they have relatively low HI column densities
(
cm-2).
Figure 5b shows the metallicity histogram with these objects excluded.
Again, the two objects with detected Ly
emission have higher
metallicities, on average, than the 11 objects without detected
Ly
emission.
The trend displayed in Figs. 5a and 5b is consistent with
a positive correlation between Ly
line luminosity
and metallicity. This in turn is consistent with a correlation
between star formation rate, for which Ly
is an
approximate indicator, and metallicity. For nearby galaxies
(z = 0), there are well known correlations between star
formation rate and mass and between metallicity and mass, in
the sense that high-mass galaxies tend to have both higher
star formation rates and metallicities than low-mass galaxies,
albeit with a great deal of scatter in samples that include
a wide or full mix of morphological types
(Tamura et al. 2001; Prada & Burkert 2002).
If the same kinds of correlations also hold at high redshift, they
could explain the observed tendency for DLA galaxies with detectable
Ly
emission to have higher metallicities than those
without detectable Ly
emission. Conversely, the
available observations of DLA galaxies could be interpreted
as (weak) evidence for luminosity-metallicity and mass-metallicity
relations at
.
The observed trend might, at first sight, appear to
contradict the idea that Ly
emission is suppressed
in galaxies with high dust content and hence high metallicity.
Ly
photons, which scatter resonantly off H atoms,
have a much longer path and a much higher probability of
absorption on dust grains than continuum photons, an effect
that reduces the equivalent width
of the
Ly
emission line. For nearby star-forming galaxies,
the observed Ly
equivalent widths show the expected
anti-correlation with metallicity, which is usually
interpreted as a consequence of absorption by dust (see
Fig. 8 of Charlot & Fall 1993). For DLA galaxies at high
redshifts,
has been measured in three cases and
a lower limit placed on it in another case. We have checked
that these equivalent widths and the corresponding
metallicities are consistent with the
relation for z = 0 galaxies and hence with the idea that the
Ly
emission is suppressed by dust.
How can we reconcile these two results, one regarding a
positive
correlation, the other a negative
correlation? First, we note that the samples
on which these hints are based are still very small, and
it is possible they will disappear with more observations.
Second, we note that there is no logical contradiction
between the two correlations. They can both exist together,
as they are observed to do in low-redshift galaxies. The
reason this is possible is that dust affects
by factors of a few, while
spans several orders
of magnitude, from low-mass to high-mass galaxies. Thus, a
positive
correlation can overwhelm a negative
correlation. More observations are needed
to confirm whether similar relations also hold for high-
redshift DLA galaxies. For now, we simply note that the
available but meager high-z data are consistent with
both low-z relations.
A measured impact parameter is in each case random and
could be anywhere in the range [0; R] where R is the radius of the
absorber. Møller & Warren (1998) found that in the mean the
measured impact parameter is 0.55R, so finding a very small
for DLAg0458-02 is therefore not in contradiction to the
result by Briggs et al. Four optical (Ly
)
impact parameters
have been reported previously: 0
93 (Fynbo et al. 1999);
0
99, 1
14, and 2
51 (Møller et al. 2002). The
median of all five is 0
99
corresponding to a disk diameter of 3
6, fully
consistent with the Briggs et al. result.
Detection of star formation induced Ly
emission from an
additional 5-10 DLAs would settle the questions raised above and should
therefore be a high priority observational goal. In order to
disentangle the dust-attenuation effect from the luminosity-metallicity
relation one would need a measure for the galaxy luminosity which is
not influenced by dust. This could be obtained via broad band imaging
of DLA galaxies with sufficiently large impact parameters, or via
detection of H
/H
emission lines.
If it is confirmed that a luminosity-metallicity relation for DLA galaxies is indeed present then this might reflect an underlying mass-metallicity relation. We have already previously shown that a large fraction of DLA galaxies are too small and too faint to be detected under the glare of the quasar point spread function (Fynbo et al. 1999), but if a mass-metallicity relation is indeed present already at high redshifts then we can add to the previous statement that those DLA galaxies most likely to be undetectable are those with the lowest metallicities, a prediction which could greatly improve the efficiency of follow-up observing campaigns. One further observational prediction would also follow immediately from this. Because the less massive DLA systems have smaller radii we predict a correlation between impact parameter and DLA metallicity.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to S. J. Warren for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript and to C. Ledoux for many helpful discussions concerning metallicities of DLAs.