A&A 422, L19-L21 (2004)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040190
R. Schulz 1 - J. A. Stüwe2 - H. Boehnhardt 3
1 - ESA Research and Scientific Support Department, ESTEC,
Postbus 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
2 -
Sterrewacht Leiden, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA Leiden,
The Netherlands
3 -
Max-Planck-Institute for Aeronomy, Max-Planck-Str. 2,
37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
Received 19 March 2004 / Accepted 5 June 2004
Abstract
The evolution of the activity and composition of the coma of
ROSETTA target comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko was studied along its
postperihelion orbit from 2.29 AU to 3.22 AU. The comet had a major drop
of activity between 2.5 AU and 2.9 AU, which manifested most obviously in its
light curve (the brightness decreased by 3 mag), but is also
confirmed by the production rates derived from spectrophotometric measurements.
The strong decrease of activity indicates a change in the outgassing behaviour
of the nucleus and might be due to water sublimation becoming less efficient.
The spectrophotometric measurements at 2.9 AU show that the coma is at least
slightly depleted in C2 with respect to CN.
Key words: comets - Rosetta - 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko - production rates
The Rosetta mission of the European Space Agency was launched 2 March 2004 to comet 67P/Churyumov- Gerasimenko, a short-period comet of the Jupiter family. Originally, Rosetta was targeted at another Jupiter-family comet, 46P/Wirtanen, with launch in January 2003. However, the launch had to be delayed owing to unforeseen problems with the launch vehicle and 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko was identified as the new target comet. Rosetta will go in orbit around the comet nucleus when it is still far from the Sun and accompany the comet along its way to and through perihelion, while 11 scientific instruments will monitor the comet's evolution along the orbit. In addition, Rosetta carries Philae, which will land on the nucleus to perform a detailed investigation of its physical and compositional properties. The mission had been optimized to the characteristics of the original target, comet 46P/Wirtanen, e.g. its gas and dust activity as determined from ground. It is therefore of utmost importance to determine the properties of the new target comet, 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimanko, and adjust the mission scenario, particularly the planning of the science operations, to achieve an optimal scientific return. A first report on optical observations of this comet is provided by Weiler et al. (2004). Here we report the gas and dust activity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimanko determined from spectrophotometric observations and broad-band images.
Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko was monitored from the European Southern
Observatory between 11 February 2003 and 26 June 2003. Postperihelion
observations (spectrophotometry and broad-band filter imaging) were obtained
between 2.295 AU and 3.224 AU heliocentric distance whereby spectra could be
taken up to 2.89 AU. Out to
AU we used the 3.6-m telescope
equipped with the EFOSC2 instrument. Beyond
AU all
observations were taken with the FORS1 instrument mounted on the VLT 1 (Antu).
To facilitate a calibration of the broad-band images, appropriate fields from
the list of Landold 1992 were observed at different airmasses each
night. For the flux calibration of the spectra, observations of the
spectrophotometric standards Feige 56 (EFOSC2) and Feige 66 & EG 274 (FORS1)
were taken.
All frames were bias subtracted and flat fielded. All observations were flux calibrated, assuming the standard atmospheric conditions described by Tüg (1977) for the extinction correction. Because of the long slit of the spectrographs (EFOSC2: 5 arcmin; FORS1: 6.8 arcmin), the sky contamination in the spectra could be determined from the spectrum frames themselves. The wavelength calibration was done via HeAr-frames.
Table 1: Photometric fluxes, F, and production rates, Q, of comet 67P/Churyumov Gerasimenko.
For each observing run, all flux calibrated spectra obtained with the same slit orientation, were co-aligned and an average spectrum as well as its rms was computed. From these spectra spatial profiles were extracted by averaging over certain wavelength bands. Furthermore the two dimensional spectra were added up along the slit over the innermost 5'' to obtain the wavelength dependence of the cometary flux in the inner coma. To the resulting one dimensional spectra (of
![]() |
Figure 1: Evolution of the spectrum of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. The continuum is fitted as a dotted line. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
Figure 1 shows the co-added spectra of the three observing runs that incuded
spectrophotometry. The emission band of CN, at 3875 Å, is clearly
present in all spectra, hence up to at least 2.9 AU. No other gas coma species
could be detected in any of the spectra. Table 1 shows the resulting production
rates and 3
upper limits for CN, C2, C3 and NH2 and the
Af
values approximating the dust production. Between 2.3 AU and
2.9 AU the CN production rate decreased by a factor of 4.8 and the
Af
value decreased by a factor of 21! The VLT observations at
2.9 AU resulted in very low values for the upper limits to the production
rates of C2 and C3. The 3
upper limit for C2 is almost a factor
of 2 lower than the detected CN production rate, which results in a ratio of
C2/CN < 0.62. Hence, at 2.9 AU comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is at least
slightly depleted in C2 according to the classification scheme introduced
by A'Hearn et al. (1995), in which comets are depleted if
C2/CN < 0.66. The 3
upper limits determined at lower heliocentric
distances, from the observations obtained with the 3.6-m telescope, are too
high to allow any firm conclusions on abundance ratios. However, observations
obtained during the comet's apparition in 1982/83 also resulted in a depleted
abundance ratio (C2/CN
0.49) at a heliocentric distance of about
1.4 AU (A'Hearn et al. 1995). As we could only determine an upper
limit for the C2/CN ratio at 2.9 AU, it cannot be decided whether
both values are indeed different. It should be mentioned, however, that
A'Hearn et al. (1995) have investigated the
dependence
of the C2 and CN production rates in this comet. Their results show that the
CN production rate decreased faster with increasing
than that of
C2.
This would effectively increase the C2/CN ratio at larger
,
which
is consistent with our result. Hence, if the difference between the two values
is real, it can be attributed in a straighforward way to the change of the
C2/CN ratio with heliocentric distance already indicated by A'Hearn et al.
(1995).
![]() |
Figure 2:
The activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Gas production
rates and AF |
| Open with DEXTER | |
Figure 2 depicts the postperihelion activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
between 2.3 AU and 3.2 AU heliocentric distance. The comet showed a very rapid
decrease in Af
between 2.5 AU and 2.9 AU. This indicates that a
major change in the outgassing behaviour of the comet nucleus occured at this
part of the orbit, which might be connected to water becoming a less dominant
species. The latter would also be consistent with the results obtained from
the long-term monitoring of comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) which showed that
water was the main driver of activity only up to about 3 AU, whereas beyond this
distance the activity of Hale-Bopp was driven by CO (Biver et al.
2002).
Between 2.9 AU and 3.2 AU comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko continued fading, but
at a much lower pace. Recent observations of the comet obtained at
AU (
AU) showed the comet as almost point
like with an R brightness of 21.6 mag (ESO 2004).
The production rates and upper limits obtained for comet
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko were compared to those of comet 46P/Wirtanen at
similar heliocentric distances.
Table 2 shows that before 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko had the major drop of
brightness, its Af
value was a factor of 4.5 higher than that of
comet 46P/Wirtanen. However, at around 2.9 AU it was almost a factor of 5 lower
than the upper limit determined for 46P/Wirtanen. Note,
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko was observed along its postperihelion orbit, while
46P/Wirtanen was covered preperihelion. During their postperihelion phase,
comets usually show higher activities than at the same preperihelion distance
to the Sun. It is therefore very likely that comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
will be at a similar or even lower activity level than comet 46P/Wirtanen at
around
AU preperihelion, i.e. at the time Philae will
land on the nucleus.
Table 2: Comparison of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko with 46P/Wirtanen.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the Director General of the European Southern Observatory for granting telescope time at the VLT on very short notice and the ESO staff at Headquartes, La Silla and Paranal for their support.